Editing Come with Us (section)

==Reception==
{{Album ratings
| MC = 72/100<ref name="Metacritic">{{cite web |url=http://www.metacritic.com/music/come-with-us |title=Reviews for ''Come with Us'' by Chemical Brothers – Metacritic |publisher=[[Metacritic]]|accessdate=18 September 2011}}</ref>
| rev1 = [[AllMusic]]
| rev1score = {{Rating|4|5}}<ref name="Bush">{{cite web |url=http://www.allmusic.com/album/come-with-us-mw0000212865 |title=''Come with Us'' – The Chemical Brothers {{!}} Songs, Reviews, Credits, Awards {{!}} AllMusic |last=Bush |first=John |publisher=[[AllMusic]]|accessdate=17 May 2015}}</ref>
| rev2 = ''[[Alternative Press (music magazine)|Alternative Press]]''
| rev2score = 7/10<ref>Alternative Press (2/02, p.67) - 7 out of 10 - "...A return to the early-'90s acid-house exuberance that first inspired them..."</ref>
| rev3 = ''[[Entertainment Weekly]]''
| rev3score = B<ref>{{cite magazine |url=http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,197219,00.html |title=Come With Us Review |last=Hermes |first=Will |magazine=Entertainment Weekly |date=28 January 2002 |accessdate=26 May 2012 |archive-date=8 January 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140108115654/http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,197219,00.html |url-status=dead }}</ref>
| rev4 = ''[[Pitchfork (website)|Pitchfork]]''
| rev4score = 6.2/10<ref>{{cite web |url=http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/1417-come-with-us/ |title=The Chemical Brothers: Come with Us |author=Nathan Rooney |date=30 January 2002 |work=Pitchfork |accessdate=18 September 2011}}</ref>
| rev5 = ''[[PopMatters]]''
| rev5score = 8/10<ref>{{cite magazine |url=http://www.popmatters.com/music/reviews/c/chemicalbrothers-come.html |title=The Chemical Brothers: Come with Us |last=Bowden |first=Marshall |magazine=[[PopMatters]] |date=29 March 2002 |accessdate=26 May 2012 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20020613010507/http://www.popmatters.com/music/reviews/c/chemicalbrothers-come.html |archivedate=13 June 2002 |url-status=dead}}</ref>
| rev6 = ''[[Q (magazine)|Q]]''
| rev6score = {{Rating|3|5}}<ref>Q (Jan/02, p.97) - 3 out of 5 stars - "...blend[s] the brutal efficiency of current dancefloor trends with...the music that prompted [them] to make records....good, clean, hedonistic fun..."</ref>
| rev7 = ''[[Rolling Stone]]''
| rev7score = {{Rating|4|5}}<ref>{{cite magazine|url=https://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/album/149849/come_with_us |title=Rolling Stone review |magazine=Rolling Stone |accessdate=4 February 2007 |url-status=bot: unknown |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20071002075044/http://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/album/149849/come_with_us |archivedate=2 October 2007}}</ref>
| rev8 = ''[[Slant Magazine|Slant]]''
| rev8score = {{Rating|4|5}}<ref>[http://www.slantmagazine.com/music/review/the-chemical-brothers-come-with-us Slant Magazine review]</ref>
| rev9 = ''[[Spin (magazine)|Spin]]''
| rev9score = 9/10<ref>They've gone one step beyond the underrated Surrender by integrating their two sides: high-octane thrust and airy psychedelic dreaminess. [Feb 2002, p.105]</ref>
| rev10 = ''[[Uncut (magazine)|Uncut]]''
| rev10score = {{rating|2.5|5}}<ref>{{cite journal |date=February 2002 |title=[''Come with Us'' review] |journal=Uncut |page=124}}</ref>
| rev11 = ''[[The Rolling Stone Album Guide]]''
| rev11Score = {{Rating|2.5|5}}<ref name="Berger">{{cite book|last=Berger|first=Arion|chapter=Chemical Brothers|pages=[https://archive.org/details/newrollingstonea00brac/page/157 157-8.]|year=2004|editor1-last=Brackett|editor1-first=Nathan|editor2-last=Hoard|editor2-first=Christian|title=[[The Rolling Stone Album Guide]]|publisher=[[Simon and Schuster]]|isbn=0-7432-0169-8}}</ref>
}}

Initial critical response to ''Come with Us'' was generally positive. At [[Metacritic]], which assigns a [[Standard score|normalised]] rating out of 100 to reviews from mainstream critics, the album has received an [[weighted mean|average]] score of 72, based on 23 reviews.<ref name="Metacritic"/> ''[[Kludge (magazine)|Kludge]]'' included it on their list of best albums of 2002.<ref>{{cite web|title=The Best of 2002|url=http://www.kludgemagazine.com/articles.php?id=186|website=[[Kludge (magazine)|Kludge]]|accessdate=25 November 2015|archiveurl=https://archive.today/20040722004721/http://www.kludgemagazine.com/articles.php?id=186|archivedate=22 July 2004 }}</ref>

Andy Puleston of the [[BBC]] said that "years ago Tom and Ed assured us 'the brother's gonna work it out'. If you've ever felt that they had yet to make good on this promise then, as far as Come with Us is concerned there was never a truer word spoken."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/music/reviews/xx3n|title = BBC – Music – Review of Chemical Brothers – Come with Us}}</ref> His review also acknowledged the success of "It Began in Afrika", saying that by "removing shrubs, laying concrete and generally paving the way for this album, "Afrika" conquered Ibiza, Notting Hill Carnival and contrived a craving amongst those with an affinity for a big, bouncy kick drum."

[[AllMusic]] said that "After forgetting the key on 1999's ''Surrender'' amidst handling all of the celebrity guests, they got back to business with Come with Us", and that "from the vocal sample introducing the opener ("behold...they're coming back"), it's clear Rowlands and Simons know the importance of this fourth album, and it detonates like a bomb blast, as though the duo knew that Come with Us had to be bigger and badder than all the bombastic breaks they'd dropped in the past."<ref name="Bush"/>

Following the album's release, the band embarked on two tours, the Go with Them tour and the North Amerika tour.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://planet-dust.laserjay.net/live.htm |title=Planet Dust - the Chemical Brothers - Live |access-date=17 June 2012 |archive-date=8 July 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130708192223/http://planet-dust.laserjay.net/live.htm |url-status=dead }}</ref>