Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Craftsman (tools)
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Legal disputes== In 1963, Sears employee Peter M. Roberts developed a quick release feature for socket wrenches. The feature allowed a person using such a ratchet to remove the socket from the wrench with one hand, freeing the second hand from grabbing the socket while the other hand held the ratchet.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/697/796/11115/|title=Peter M. Roberts, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, Defendant-appellant, 697 F.2d 796 (7th Cir. 1983)|website=Justia Law}}</ref> Roberts developed a prototype and applied for a patent in 1964.<ref>{{cite patent |country=US |number=3208318A |title=Quick Release for Socket Wrenches }}</ref> While the patent was pending, he approached Sears and introduced the idea to them. Sears, which sold millions of sockets every year, saw the potential in the invention and asked for the prototype so it could be tested. After testing revealed the quick release would not weaken the ratchet, Sears began market testing the new ratchet and received favorable feedback. Sears then incorporated the quick release into a new line of ratchets, projecting sales of up to 750,000 units in the first year alone. In January 1965, Roberts received a phone call from a Sears attorney asking for the name of Roberts' patent lawyer. Without Roberts's knowledge, Sears hired the patent lawyer, Charles Fay, and Fay ended up representing both Roberts and Sears regarding the patent. Around this time, Roberts's patent was approved, but Fay did not reveal this to Roberts. Negotiations for use of the quick release commenced, with Roberts being told that the quick release wasn't new and that any patent issued would be limited. Sears's lawyers also said that because of the cost (44 cents per wrench) of adding the quick release to the wrenches, a license was worth only $10,000.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1986-07-14-fi-19337-story.html |title='The Wrench Case': Inventor vs. Sears: 17-Year-Old Saga Continues |website=[[Los Angeles Times]] |date=July 14, 1986 }}</ref> What Sears didn't tell Roberts was that it planned to make 50,000 of the new wrenches per week.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1982/04/03/business/sears-loses-patent-suit-clerk-wins-5-million-in-sears-case.html |title=Sears Loses Patent Suit; Clerk Wins $5 Million In Sears Case |newspaper=The New York Times |date=April 3, 1982 }}</ref> Roberts sued Sears in 1969 after seeing his quick release on a wrench prominently displayed in a Sears catalog, but it wasn't until 1989 that the case was finally settled. Neither side revealed the amount of the settlement.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://apnews.com/aed4a37bc719aba52db82cb96029fded |title=Retailer, Inventor Reach Settlement in 20-Year-Old Lawsuit |website=[[Associated Press]] }}</ref> In August 2002, Sears sued Emerson for using Sears-owned manufacturing equipment to create power tools for Home Depot. Upon the expiration of Emerson's 30-year contract to make Craftsman tools, Emerson was required to return the Sears-owned equipment. Instead, Emerson kept the equipment, claiming it to be obsolete and of little value. Emerson denied the allegations when the suit was filed, but paid Sears $10.8 million and returned all the equipment, while admitting no wrongdoing.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-2004-01-07-0401070338-story.html |title=Sears to Receive $10.8 Million from Emerson in Tools Suit |website=[[Chicago Tribune]] |date=January 7, 2004 }}</ref> In 2004, a [[class action]] by customers accused Sears of false advertising and consumer fraud for questionable use of the slogan "Made in the USA" for Craftsman tools.<ref>{{Cite web |work=[[ConsumerAffairs.com]] |title=Suit Hits Sears Made in USA Claim |url=http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/sears_craftsman.html |date=December 8, 2004 |access-date=October 22, 2008 }}</ref> In 2012, Sears was sued by LoggerHead Tools, makers of the Bionic Wrench, after Sears released a competing product, the MaxAccess. Sears had sold the Bionic Wrench in its stores, but decided to not talk to LoggerHead about licensing the patent. Instead, Sears had its tool manufacturer, Apex Tools, create the MaxAccess wrench under the Craftsman name, claiming that the MaxAccess was designed not to infringe the Bionic Wrench patent. Other than coloring, the only substantial difference between the two wrenches was that the Bionic Wrench had the head at a 45-degree angle while the MaxAccess head was straight. LoggerHead was subsequently awarded $6 million in damages, but the verdict to be set aside because the judge misinterpreted the LoggerHead patent.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20170516/NEWS07/170519901/sears-loses-patent-lawsuit-to-loggerhead-over-a-u-s-made-wrench |title=Sears Loses Patent Lawsuit to LoggerHead over a U.S.-Made Wrench |website=Crain's Chicago Business |date=May 15, 2017 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-biz-sears-bionic-wrench-patent-lawsuit-20180724-story.html |title=Maker of the Bionic Wrench Thought It Was Getting $6 Million in Patent Lawsuit against Sears. Not So Fast, Judge Says |newspaper=[[Chicago Tribune]] |date=July 24, 2018 }}</ref> In April 2017, Sears sued Western Forge, its former supplier of hand tools, for abruptly ending the contract to supply the tools. Western Forge violated the contract by demanding more money because of Sears's financial problems.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://consumerist.com/2017/06/07/sears-settles-with-one-craftsman-supplier-files-new-lawsuit-against-usa-made-hand-tool-company/ |title=Sears Settles with One Craftsman Supplier, Files New Lawsuit against USA-Made Hand Tool Company |website=Consumerist |date=June 7, 2017 }}</ref> On March 6, 2019, Sears was sued by Stanley Black & Decker, which accused it of breach of contract and trademark infringement over its new line of professional-grade mechanics tools under the Craftsman Ultimate Collection brand. According to the complaint, Sears breached the license agreement by launching its new tool line and touting its stores as "the real home of the broadest assortment of Craftsman".<ref>{{Cite web |work=[[cnbc.com]] |title=Sears Is Sued over 'Craftsman' Brand |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/07/sears-is-sued-over-craftsman-brand.html |date=March 7, 2019 |access-date=May 20, 2019 }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)