Editing Critique of Judgment (section)

==Influences==

Though Kant consistently maintains that the human mind is not an "[[intuitive understanding]]"—something that creates the phenomena which it cognizes—several of his readers (starting with [[Fichte]], culminating in [[Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling|Schelling]]) believed that it must be (and often give Kant credit).

Kant's discussions of [[Schema (Kant)|schema]] and [[symbol]] late in the first half of the ''Critique of Judgement'' also raise questions about the way the mind represents its objects to itself, and so are foundational for an understanding of the development of much late 20th-century [[continental philosophy]]: [[Jacques Derrida]] is known to have studied the book extensively.

In ''[[Truth and Method]]'' (1960), [[Hans-Georg Gadamer]] rejects Kantian aesthetics as ahistorical in his development of a historically-grounded [[hermeneutics]].<ref>{{cite book|last=Gadamer|first=Hans-Georg|title=Truth and Method|url=https://archive.org/details/truthmethod00gada|url-access=limited|year=1960|publisher=Continuum|isbn=082647697X|page=[https://archive.org/details/truthmethod00gada/page/n70 36]|edition=2002}}</ref><ref>{{Cite encyclopedia|url=http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/gadamer-aesthetics/|title=Gadamer's Aesthetics|first=Nicholas|last=Davey|encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy|year=2007}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/24338-gadamer-and-the-legacy-of-german-idealism/|title=Review: Gadamer and the Legacy of German Idealism by Kristin Gjesdal|first=Robert|last=Dorstal|year=2010|work=Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews|publisher=University of Notre Dame}}</ref>