Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Cultural diffusion
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Medieval Europe== Diffusion theory has been advanced{{according to whom|date=July 2015}} as an explanation for the "[[European miracle]]", the adoption of technological innovation in [[Middle Ages|medieval Europe]] which by the 19th century culminated in European technological achievement surpassing the [[Science in the medieval Islamic world|Islamic world]] and [[Ming dynasty|China]].<ref>Carlo M. Cipolla, Before the Industrial revolution: European Society and Economy 1000β1700, W.W. Norton and Co., New York (1980) {{ISBN|0-393-95115-4}}</ref> Technological imports to medieval Europe include [[gunpowder]], [[clock]] mechanisms, [[shipbuilding]], paper, and the [[windmill]]; however, in each of these cases, Europeans not only adopted the technologies but improved the manufacturing scale, inherent technology, and applications to a point clearly surpassing the evolution of the original invention in its country of origin. There are also some historians who have questioned whether Europe really owes the development of such inventions as gunpowder, the compass, the windmill or printing to the Chinese or other cultures.<ref>Peter Jackson: ''The Mongols and the West'', Pearson Longman 2005, p. 315</ref><ref>[[Donald F. Lach]]: ''Asia in the Making of Europe''. 3 volumes, Chicago, Illinois, 1965β93; I:1, pp. 82β83</ref><ref>Robert Bartlett: ''The Making of Europe. Conquest, Colonization and Cultural Change 950β1350'', Allen Lane, 1993</ref> However, historian Peter Frankopan argues that influences, particularly trade, through the Middle East and Central Asia to China through the silk roads have been overlooked in traditional histories of the "rise of the West". He argues that the Renaissance was funded with trade with the east (due to the demise of Byzantium at the hands of Venice and the Fourth Crusade), and that the trade allowed ideas and technology to be shared with Europe. But the constant warfare and rivalry in Europe meant there was extreme evolutionary pressure for developing these ideas for military and economic advantage, and a desperate need to use them in expansion.<ref>'The Silk Roads: A New History of the World' {{ISBN|9781101912379}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)