Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
David and Jonathan
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Traditional Christian interpretation === [[File:Saul Tries to Kill David by Julius Schnorr von Carolsfeld.png|thumb|200px|left|"Saul Tries to Kill David" by [[Julius Schnorr von Karolsfeld]]]] In Christian tradition, David and Jonathan's love is understood as the intimate camaraderie between two young soldiers with no sexual involvement.<ref>[http://www.ewordtoday.com/comments/1samuel/mh/1samuel18.htm Matthew Henry, 1Samuel 18:1–5] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100625073708/http://www.ewordtoday.com/comments/1samuel/mh/1samuel18.htm |date=2010-06-25 }}; 2Samual 1:17–27</ref> David's abundance of wives and [[concubines]] is emphasized, alongside his adulterous affair with [[Bathsheba]], and that he only experienced impotence as an old man, while having his five-year-old son Jonathan at his death.<ref>James B. deYoung, ''Homosexuality'', p. 290</ref> In response to the argument that homoeroticism was edited out, some traditionalists who subscribe to the [[Documentary Hypothesis]] note the significance of the lack of censoring of the descriptions at issue, in spite of the Levitical injunctions against homoerotic contact. Gagnon states, "The narrator’s willingness to speak of David’s vigorous heterosexual life (compare the relationship with Bathsheba) puts in stark relief his (their) complete silence about any sexual activity between David and Jonathan."<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.robgagnon.net/articles/homosexNewsweekMillerResp.pdf|title=Prof. Dr. Robert A. J. Gagnon}}</ref> Presuming such editing would have taken place, Martti Nissinen comments, "Their mutual love was certainly regarded by the editors as faithful and passionate, but without unseemly allusions to forbidden practices ... Emotional and even physical closeness of two males did not seem to concern the editors of the story, nor was such a relationship prohibited by [[Leviticus]]." [[Homosociality]] is not seen as being part of the sexual [[taboo]] in the biblical world.<ref>Martti Nissinen, Kirsi Stjerna, ''Homoeroticism in the Biblical World'', p. 56</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)