Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Depth charge
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Later developments== For the reasons expressed above, the depth charge was generally replaced as an anti-submarine weapon. Initially, this was by ahead-throwing weapons such as the British-developed [[Hedgehog (weapon)|Hedgehog]] and later [[Squid (weapon)|Squid]] mortars. These weapons threw a pattern of warheads ahead of the attacking vessel to bracket a submerged contact. The Hedgehog was contact fuzed, while the Squid fired a pattern of three large, {{cvt|200|kg|lb|order=flip}} depth charges with clockwork detonators. Later developments included the [[Mark 24 Mine|Mark 24 "Fido"]] acoustic homing torpedo (and later such weapons), and the [[SUBROC]], which was armed with a nuclear depth charge. The [[Soviet Union|USSR]], United States and United Kingdom developed [[nuclear depth bomb]]s. {{ As of | 2018 }}, the [[Royal Navy]] retains a depth charge labelled as Mk11 Mod 3, which can be deployed from its [[AgustaWestland AW159 Wildcat|AgustaWestland Wildcat]] and [[AgustaWestland AW101|Merlin HM.2 helicopters]].<ref>{{cite news|title=815 NAVAL AIR SQUADRON|publisher=Fleet Air Arm Association |url=https://www.fleetairarmoa.org/Content/sites/FAAOA/pages/178/20081118-cjj-final-815history.PDF|access-date=21 June 2018|date=21 June 2018}}</ref><ref>{{citation |author=Ministry of Defence |title=Written answer 4.5.2.5 (Type 26 Frigate) to Defence Select Committee |publisher=parliament.uk|date=9 October 2014 |url=https://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons-committees/defence/141009_SoS_re_Type_26_Global_Combat_Ship.pdf|access-date=21 June 2018}}</ref> Russia has also developed homing (but unpropelled) depth charges including the [[S3V Zagon]] and the [[RBU-6000|90SG]].<ref name=roe-rpk>{{cite web |title=Anti-submarine rocket launcher system RPK-8 {{!}} |url=http://roe.ru/eng/catalog/naval-systems/shipborne-weapons/rpk-8/ |website=Catalog Rosoboronexport roe.ru}}</ref> China has also produced such weapons.<ref>{{cite web |title=PLANAF conducts live-fire exercise with new guided depth charge |url=https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/planaf-conducts-live-fire-exercise-with-new-guided-depth-charge |website=Janes.com |date=December 8, 2020|language=en}}</ref> ===Signaling=== During the [[Cold War]] when it was necessary to inform submarines of the other side that they had been detected but without actually launching an attack, low-power "signalling depth charges" (also called "practice depth charges") were sometimes used, powerful enough to be detected when no other means of communication was possible, but not destructive.<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=S0D_CAAAQBAJ&pg=PA43 |title=Leadership: Limits and Possibilities |first=Keith |last=Grint |page=43 |isbn=9781137070586 |date=2005-01-20 |publisher=Macmillan Education UK }}{{Dead link|date=January 2024 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)