Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Foundations of mathematics
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Real analysis === {{See also|Mathematical analysis#History}} [[Cauchy]] (1789–1857) started the project of giving rigorous bases to [[infinitesimal calculus]]. In particular, he rejected the heuristic principle that he called the [[generality of algebra]], which consisted to apply properties of [[algebraic operation]]s to [[infinite sequences]] without proper proofs. In his ''[[Cours d'Analyse]]'' (1821), he considered ''very small quantities'', which could presently be called "sufficiently small quantities"; that is, a sentence such that "if {{mvar|x}} is very small {{nowrap|then ..."}} must be understood as "there is a (sufficiently large) [[natural number]] {{mvar|n}} such that {{math|{{abs|''x''}} < 1/''n''}}". In the proofs he used this in a way that predated the modern [[(ε, δ)-definition of limit]].<ref name="Grabiner1983">{{Citation | last = Grabiner | first = Judith V. | title = Who Gave You the Epsilon? Cauchy and the Origins of Rigorous Calculus | journal = [[American Mathematical Monthly]] | volume = 90 | issue = 3 | pages = 185–194 | doi = 10.2307/2975545 | year = 1983 | jstor = 2975545 }}, collected in [http://www.maa.org/ebooks/spectrum/WGE.html Who Gave You the Epsilon?], {{isbn|978-0-88385-569-0}} pp. 5–13. Also available at: http://www.maa.org/pubs/Calc_articles/ma002.pdf</ref> The modern [[(ε, δ)-definition of limit]]s and [[continuous functions]] was first developed by [[Bernard Bolzano|Bolzano]] in 1817, but remained relatively unknown, and Cauchy probably did know Bolzano's work. [[Karl Weierstrass]] (1815–1897) formalized and popularized the (ε, δ)-definition of limits, and discovered some pathological functions that seemed paradoxical at this time, such as [[Weierstrass function|continuous, nowhere-differentiable functions]]. Indeed, such functions contradict previous conceptions of a function as a rule for computation or a smooth graph. At this point, the program of [[arithmetization of analysis]] (reduction of [[mathematical analysis]] to arithmetic and algebraic operations) advocated by Weierstrass was essentially completed, except for two points. Firstly, a formal definition of real numbers was still lacking. Indeed, beginning with [[Richard Dedekind]] in 1858, several mathematicians worked on the definition of the real numbers, including [[Hermann Hankel]], [[Charles Méray]], and [[Eduard Heine]], but this is only in 1872 that two independent complete definitions of real numbers were published: one by Dedekind, by means of [[Dedekind cut]]s; the other one by [[Georg Cantor]] as equivalence classes of [[Cauchy sequences]].<ref>{{MacTutor| class=HistTopics| id=Real_numbers_2| title=The real numbers: Stevin to Hilbert|date=October 2005}}</ref> Several problems were left open by these definitions, which contributed to the [[foundational crisis of mathematics]]. Firstly both definitions suppose that [[rational number]]s and thus [[natural number]]s are rigorously defined; this was done a few years later with [[Peano axioms]]. Secondly, both definitions involve [[infinite set]]s (Dedekind cuts and sets of the elements of a Cauchy sequence), and Cantor's [[set theory]] was published several years later. The third problem is more subtle: and is related to the foundations of logic: classical logic is a [[first-order logic]]; that is, [[quantifier (logic)|quantifier]]s apply to variables representing individual elements, not to variables representing (infinite) sets of elements. The basic property of the [[completeness of the real numbers]] that is required for defining and using real numbers involves a quantification on infinite sets. Indeed, this property may be expressed either as ''for every infinite sequence of real numbers, if it is a [[Cauchy sequence]], it has a limit that is a real number'', or as ''every subset of the real numbers that is [[bounded set|bounded]] has a [[least upper bound]] that is a real number''. This need of quantification over infinite sets is one of the motivation of the development of [[higher-order logic]]s during the first half of the 20th century.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)