Editing FutureGen (section)

===Funding cancellation===
On January 29, 2008, the U.S. Department of Energy announced that it would pull its funding for the project, mostly due to higher than expected costs. The move is likely to delay the project as other members seek the additional funds that the DOE was to provide. The sudden concern over cost after an Illinois site was chosen over those in Texas raised questions about the motives for the cancellation. Local and state officials in Illinois, including then Governor [[Rod Blagojevich]], expressed frustration at the move, especially in light of the money and resources that the state had spent to attract the project. Democratic Senator [[Dick Durbin]] of Illinois accused Energy Secretary [[Samuel Bodman]] of "cruel deception" of Illinoisans by "creating false hope in a FutureGen project which he has no intention of funding or supporting."<ref>{{cite news
| agency = Associated Press
| title = U.S. lawmakers: Energy Department pulls support for FutureGen
| work = Daily Herald
| date = 2008-01-29
| url = http://www.dailyherald.com/story/?id=123764&src=109
| access-date = 2009-03-10}}</ref> Durbin claimed that "when the city of Mattoon, Illinois, was chosen over possible locations in Texas, the secretary of energy set out to kill FutureGen."<ref name=ChT>{{cite news
 |last       = Secter
 |first      = Bob
 |title      = Energy Department backing out of Illinois-bound FutureGen project, officials say
 |work       = Chicago Tribune
 |date       = 2008-01-30
 |url        = http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-future-gen_30jan30,1,280681.story
 |access-date = 2008-02-02
}}{{dead link|date=January 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> Mattoon mayor David Cline said "one could question the motivation of the Department of Energy which was ready to move forward with the project until a site other than Texas was chosen."<ref name=ChT/>

In March 2009, Congressional auditors determined that the DOE had miscalculated the government portion of the project's cost, overstating the amount by a half billion dollars.  As a result, the Bush administration cited the project as having nearly doubled in cost when, in reality, it had increased by 39%<ref>{{cite news
| last = Wald
| first = Matthew
| title = Energy Dept. Said to Err on Coal Project
| work = New York Times
| date = 2009-03-10
| url = https://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/11/science/earth/11coal.html?_r=1&ref=business
| access-date = 2009-12-12}}</ref>

Secretary Bodman stated that with restructuring the FutureGen project, DOE plans "to equip multiple new clean-coal power plants with advanced CCS technology, instead of one demonstration plant. That will provide more electricity from multiple clean-coal plants, sequestering at least twice as much CO<sub>2</sub> and providing for wider use and more rapid commercialization."<ref>{{cite news
 |last        = Bodman
 |first       = Samuel W.
 |title       = New technology makes FutureGen a waste of tax money
 |work        = St. Louis Post-Dispatch
 |date        = 2008-02-06
 |url         = http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/editorialcommentary/story/FED1EF50F9C186CA862573E70017463B?OpenDocument
 |access-date  = 2008-02-11
 |url-status     = dead
 |archive-url  = https://web.archive.org/web/20080210071104/http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/editorialcommentary/story/FED1EF50F9C186CA862573E70017463B?OpenDocument
 |archive-date = 2008-02-10
}}</ref>