Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Gravitational singularity
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Naked singularity=== {{Main Article|Naked singularity}} Until the early 1990s, it was widely believed that general relativity hides every singularity behind an [[event horizon]], making naked singularities impossible. This is referred to as the [[cosmic censorship hypothesis]]. However, in 1991, physicists Stuart Shapiro and [[Saul Teukolsky]] performed computer simulations of a rotating plane of dust that indicated that general relativity might allow for "naked" singularities. What these objects would actually look like in such a model is unknown. Nor is it known whether singularities would still arise if the simplifying assumptions used to make the simulation were removed. However, it is hypothesized that light entering a singularity would similarly have its geodesics terminated, thus making the [[naked singularity]] look like a black hole.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Bojowald |first=Martin |year=2008 |title=Loop Quantum Cosmology |journal=Living Reviews in Relativity |language=en |volume=11 |issue=1 |pages=4 |bibcode=2008LRR....11....4B |doi=10.12942/lrr-2008-4 |issn=2367-3613 |pmc=5255532 |pmid=28163606 |doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Goswami |first1=Rituparno |last2=Joshi |first2=Pankaj S. |year=2008 |title=Spherical gravitational collapse in N dimensions |journal=Physical Review D |language=en |volume=76 |issue=8 |pages=084026 |arxiv=gr-qc/0608136 |bibcode=2007PhRvD..76h4026G |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.76.084026 |issn=1550-7998 |s2cid=119441682}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Goswami |first1=Rituparno |last2=Joshi |first2=Pankaj S. |last3=Singh |first3=Parampreet |date=2006-01-27 |title=Quantum Evaporation of a Naked Singularity |journal=Physical Review Letters |language=en |volume=96 |issue=3 |pages=031302 |arxiv=gr-qc/0506129 |bibcode=2006PhRvL..96c1302G |doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.031302 |issn=0031-9007 |pmid=16486681 |s2cid=19851285}}</ref> Disappearing event horizons exist in the [[Kerr metric]], which is a spinning black hole in a vacuum, if the [[angular momentum]] (<math>J</math>) is high enough. Transforming the Kerr metric to [[Boyer–Lindquist coordinates]], it can be shown<ref>{{harvnb|Hobson|Efstathiou|Lasenby|2013|pp=300-305}}.</ref> that the coordinate (which is not the radius) of the event horizon is, <math>r_{\pm} = \mu \pm \left(\mu^{2} - a^{2}\right)^{1/2}</math>, where <math>\mu = G M / c^{2}</math>, and <math>a=J/M c</math>. In this case, "event horizons disappear" means when the solutions are complex for <math>r_{\pm}</math>, or <math>\mu^{2} < a^{2}</math>. However, this corresponds to a case where <math>J</math> exceeds <math>GM^{2}/c</math> (or in [[Planck units]], {{Nowrap|<math>J > M^{2}</math>)}}; i.e. the spin exceeds what is normally viewed as the upper limit of its physically possible values. Similarly, disappearing event horizons can also be seen with the [[Reissner–Nordström metric|Reissner–Nordström]] geometry of a charged black hole if the charge (<math>Q</math>) is high enough. In this metric, it can be shown<ref>{{harvnb|Hobson|Efstathiou|Lasenby|2013|pp=320-325}}.</ref> that the singularities occur at <math>r_{\pm}= \mu \pm \left(\mu^{2} - q^{2}\right)^{1/2}</math>, where <math>\mu = G M / c^{2}</math>, and <math>q^2 = G Q^2/\left(4 \pi \epsilon_0 c^4\right)</math>. Of the three possible cases for the relative values of <math>\mu</math> and <math>q</math>, the case where <math>\mu^{2} < q^{2}</math> causes both <math>r_{\pm}</math> to be complex. This means the metric is regular for all positive values of <math>r</math>, or in other words, the singularity has no event horizon. However, this corresponds to a case where <math>Q/\sqrt{4 \pi \epsilon_0}</math> exceeds <math>M\sqrt{G}</math> (or in Planck units, {{Nowrap|<math>Q > M</math>)}}; i.e. the charge exceeds what is normally viewed as the upper limit of its physically possible values. Also, actual astrophysical black holes are not expected to possess any appreciable charge. A black hole possessing the lowest <math>M</math> value consistent with its <math>J</math> and <math>Q</math> values and the limits noted above; i.e., one just at the point of losing its event horizon, is termed [[extremal black hole|extremal]].
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)