Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Intangible asset
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Research and development === [[Research and development]] (known also as R&D<ref name=":0" />) is considered to be an intangible asset (about 16 percent of all intangible assets in the US),<ref>Bureau of Economic Analysis (2013). ''Preview of the 2013 Comprehensive Revision of the National Income and Product Accounts.'' https://www.bea.gov/scb/pdf/2013/03%20March/0313_nipa_comprehensive_revision_preview.pdf {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170702045919/https://www.bea.gov/scb/pdf/2013/03%20March/0313_nipa_comprehensive_revision_preview.pdf |date=2017-07-02 }}</ref> even though most countries treat R&D as current expenses for both legal and tax purposes.<ref name=":0" /> Most countries report some intangibles in their National Income and Product Accounts (NIPA).{{Citation needed|date=August 2020}} The contribution of intangible assets in long-term GDP growth has been recognized by economists.<ref name="federalreserve.gov">[[Carol Corrado|Corrado, Carol]]. Charles Hulten, and Daniel Sichel (2006). ''Intangible Capital and Economic Growth.'' Federal Reserve Board Discussion Paper N. 2006-24. April. http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2006/200624/200624pap.pdf</ref> Also of note, acquired "In-Process Research and Development" (IPR&D) is considered an asset under US GAAP.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2014/01/Defining-Issues-O-1401-04.pdf|title=AICPA Issues Practice Aid on Acquired In-Process Research and Development Assets|work=Defining Issues|publisher=KPMG, LLD|date=January 2014|edition=14-4}}</ref> IAS 38 requires any project that results in the generation of a resource to the entity be classified into two phases: a research phase, and a development phase. The classification of research and development expenditure can be highly subjective, and it is important to note that organizations may have ulterior motives in their classification of research and development expenditures.{{citation needed|date=November 2013}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)