Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Jobseeker's Allowance
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Statistics== According to ''[[The Economist]]'', in 2015 roughly 2% of [[Welfare state in the United Kingdom|welfare]] expenditure in the UK was spent on unemployment benefits; the bulk was spent in other areas.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.economist.com/news/britain/21657397-conservative-chancellor-has-managed-politically-tricky-welfare-cut-millions-may|title=George Osborne's sad triumph|department=Bagehot's notebook|date=9 July 2015|newspaper=The Economist|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170912180108/https://www.economist.com/news/britain/21657397-conservative-chancellor-has-managed-politically-tricky-welfare-cut-millions-may|archive-date=12 September 2017|df=dmy-all|quote=A majority of Britons think the government spends too much on benefits. Yet that is based on an exaggerated idea of how much of the Β£220-billion ($340-billion) welfare bill goes on dole [unemployment benefits]. Only about 2% does. Most of the budget is swallowed by pensioner benefits; child, disability and incapacity benefits account for much of the rest.}} </ref> The average number of claimants between the years 2003 and 2008 was 814,000 and average number of new claims was approximately 2,463,000.<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zwKGr3mVJ4MC&pg=PA18 |title=Department for Work and Pensions: Communicating with Customers : Report |date=2009 |publisher=[[The Stationery Office]] |isbn=978-0-10-295478-4 |language=en}}</ref> Nearly 40% of income-based claimants during 2003 were also claiming Housing Benefit.<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=avu-V_ybOaUC&pg=RA1-PA14 |title=Dealing with the Complexity of the Benefits System: Department for Work and Pensions |date=2005-11-18 |publisher=[[The Stationery Office]] |isbn=978-0-10-293615-5 |language=en}}</ref> The DWP for England and Wales showed one third of the total number of claimants for JSA were persons having been convicted of a crime resulting in their act(s) having been recorded by the police authorities.<ref name="PRESS RELEASE March 2012"/><ref>{{Cite book |last=Herring |first=Jonathan |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1K7DzgEACAAJ |title=Criminal Law: Text, Cases, and Materials |date=2022 |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |isbn=978-0-19-285592-3 |language=en}}</ref> In ''The Guardian'' newspaper in March 2001, the success of the [[New Deal (United Kingdom)|New Deal scheme]] was reported; the report stated that 270,000 people were found full-time employment and the cost of achieving this end was half of the estimated amount.<ref name="Phillip Inman ">{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2001/mar/08/welfare.budget2001 |first=P. |last=Inman |date=8 March 2001|work=The Guardian|title=New Deal enters the fast lane|access-date=11 June 2012|location=London|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140308035658/http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2001/mar/08/welfare.budget2001|archive-date=8 March 2014|df=dmy-all}}</ref> According to a report in 2008 by the [[Social Market Foundation]] there were approximately 100,000 long-term unemployed persons claiming JSA, at any given time.<ref name=" Mulheirn & Menne" >{{cite web|url=https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:QTtY2qtgSPUJ:www.smf.co.uk/assets/files/publications/SMF_Flexible_New_Deal.pdf+&gl=uk&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESgjbJ2F3c6M9vO_wCWWdPAsLs8WmIYBfoCyxsk3nu5dqAy6vYPYw4NtSL7J_P7SKGKqqYRyH8G8OFBQWX6mUQkxP0MpHy8NqAOIi66dmf932TzGvDS5t7iCJgjYFFjKMdivuspm |first1=I. |last1=Mulheirn |first2=V. |last2=Menne|publisher=Social Market Foundation |date=September 2008 |title=The Flexible New Deal: Making it work|access-date=11 June 2012}}</ref>{{better source needed|reason=Google Docs is not an authoritative source β anyone can put any old rubbish there|date=March 2024}} From 2010 to April 2011 the number of claimants having [[#Sanctioning|sanctions]] imposed increased to 75,000 persons amid claims that [[#Criticism of sanctions|DWP staff deliberately made claiming more difficult]] and [[#Alleged pressure on Job centre staff|were required to refer 3 people a week for sanctions]]. The number of disabled people sanctioned doubled to 20,000 over the same period. The Department for Work and Pensions denied persecuting vulnerable people.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2011/apr/01/jobcentres-tricking-people-benefit-sanctions|title=Jobcentres 'tricking' people out of benefits to cut costs, says whistleblower|first=John |last=Domokos|work=The Guardian|date=1 April 2011|access-date=9 July 2012|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131001203710/http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2011/apr/01/jobcentres-tricking-people-benefit-sanctions|archive-date=1 October 2013|df=dmy-all}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)