Editing Leeds and Liverpool Canal (section)

====Second phase====
{{Infobox UK legislation
| short_title           = Leeds and Liverpool Canal Act 1790
| type                  = Act
| parliament            = Parliament of Great Britain
| long_title            = An Act to enable the Company of Proprietors of the Canal Navigation from Leeds to Liverpool, to vary the Line of the said Canal Navigation, and to raise a further Sum of Money for the Purpose of completing the said Canal Navigation, and for other Purposes.
| year                  = 1790
| citation              = [[30 Geo. 3]]. c. 65
| introduced_commons    = 
| introduced_lords      = 
| territorial_extent    = 
| royal_assent          = 9 June 1790
| commencement          = 
| expiry_date           = 
| repeal_date           = 
| amends                = 
| replaces              = 
| amendments            = 
| repealing_legislation = 
| related_legislation   = 
| status                = 
| legislation_history   = 
| theyworkforyou        = 
| millbankhansard       = 
| original_text         = 
| revised_text          = 
| use_new_UK-LEG        = 
| UK-LEG_title          = 
| collapsed             = yes
}}
In 1789 [[Robert Whitworth (canal engineer)|Robert Whitworth]] developed fresh proposals to vary the line of the remaining part of the canal, including a tunnel at [[Foulridge]], lowering the proposed summit level by {{convert|40|ft}}, using a more southerly route in Lancashire. These proposals were authorised by a fresh act of Parliament, the '''{{visible anchor|Leeds and Liverpool Canal Act 1790}}''' ([[30 Geo. 3]]. c. 65), together with further fund-raising, and in 1791, construction of the canal finally recommenced south-westward from Gargrave,<ref name="llcs"/> heading toward [[Barrowford]] in Lancashire. By this time planning for the competing [[Rochdale Canal]] was under way and it was likely to offer a more direct journey to Liverpool via Manchester and the Bridgewater Canal. The same year [[John Rennie the Elder|John Rennie]] surveyed a branch of the Rochdale between [[Todmorden]] and Burnley.<ref>{{cite book |first=Cyril |last=Boucher |title=John Rennie The life and Work of A Great Engineer 1761–1821 |publisher=Manchester University Press |year=1963 |page=124 }}</ref>

{{Infobox UK legislation
| short_title           = Leeds and Liverpool Canal Act 1794
| type                  = Act
| parliament            = Parliament of Great Britain
| long_title            = An act to enable the company of proprietors of the canal navigation from Leeds to Liverpool, to complete the said navigation, and to vary the line thereof, and to raise a further fum of money for those purposes; and for making a navigable branch, therein described, from the intended new line of the said canal.
| year                  = 1794
| citation              = [[34 Geo. 3]]. c. 94
| introduced_commons    = 
| introduced_lords      = 
| territorial_extent    = 
| royal_assent          = 9 May 1794
| commencement          = 
| expiry_date           = 
| repeal_date           = 
| amends                = 
| replaces              = 
| amendments            = 
| repealing_legislation = 
| related_legislation   = 
| status                = 
| legislation_history   = 
| theyworkforyou        = 
| millbankhansard       = 
| original_text         = 
| revised_text          = 
| use_new_UK-LEG        = 
| UK-LEG_title          = 
| collapsed             = yes
}}
In 1794 an agreement was reached with the [[Manchester, Bolton and Bury Canal]] company to create a link near Red Moss near [[Horwich]].<ref>{{harvnb |Priestley |1831 |p=435}}</ref> The company's experiences running the two sections of the canal had shown that coal not limestone would be its main cargo,<ref name="Bradford"/> and that there was plenty of income available from local trade between the settlements along the route. With this in mind in the same year, the route was changed again with a further act of Parliament,<ref name = "llcs"/> the '''{{visible anchor|Leeds and Liverpool Canal Act 1794}}''' ([[34 Geo. 3]]. c. 94), moving closer to that proposed by Burdett.

The Manchester, Bolton and Bury Canal company proposed another link from Bury to Accrington. This new link would have been known as the [[Haslingden Canal]]. The Peel family asked the canal company not to construct the crossing over the [[River Hyndburn]] above their textile printworks; such a crossing would have required the construction of embankments, and reduced the water supply to their factories.<ref name = "Cotton">{{Cite web |last=Clarke |first=Mike |title=The Leeds-Liverpool Canal |url=http://www.cottontown.org/Transport/Pages/Canals.aspx |publisher=cottontown.org |access-date=18 August 2008 }}</ref> Consequently, Accrington was bypassed and the Haslingden Canal was never built.
<!--PLEASE LEAVE THIS TEXT HERE UNTIL I CLARIFY--"to a location along the Leeds Liverpool Canal in North East Lancashire, but this was rejected by the [[House of Lords]].<ref name=Tomlinson>{{cite book | last = Tomlinson | first = V I | title = The Manchester Bolton And Bury Canal Navigation 1790–1845 | publisher = Lancashire And Cheshire Antiquarian Society | year = 1969 | url = http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B00165SCDA | asin = B00165SCDA }}</ref>"-->

Yet more fund-raising took place, as the [[Foulridge Tunnel]] was proving difficult and expensive to dig. The new route took the canal south via the expanding coal mines at [[Burnley]],<ref>{{cite news |title=Lancashire Historic Town Survey Programme Burnley |url=http://www.lancashire.gov.uk/environment/documents/historictowns/BurnleyComplete_LowRes.pdf |publisher=Lancashire County Council |access-date=3 March 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121001073057/http://www.lancashire.gov.uk/environment/documents/historictowns/BurnleyComplete_LowRes.pdf |archive-date=1 October 2012 }}</ref> [[Accrington]] and [[Blackburn]], but would require some sizable earthworks to pass the former. The completion in 1796 of the {{convert|1640|yd|m|-1|abbr=off|adj=mid|-long}} Foulridge Tunnel and the flight of seven locks at Barrowford enabled the canal to open to eastern Burnley.<ref name = "llcs"/> At a cost of £40,000 (about £3.65 million in 2014). The tunnel became the most expensive single item in the whole project.{{Inflation-fn|UK|df=y}}<ref>{{cite news |last=Johnson |first=Gill |publication-date=12 February 2014 |year=2014 |title=Canals came at high cost to human life |work=Lancashire Telegraph |url=http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/archive/2014/02/12/11005109.Canals_came_at_high_cost_to_human_life/ |access-date=25 January 2015 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150402093404/http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/archive/2014/02/12/11005109.Canals_came_at_high_cost_to_human_life/ |archive-date=2 April 2015 }}</ref>

At Burnley, rather than using two sets of locks to cross the shallow [[River Calder, Lancashire|Calder]] valley, Whitworth designed the [[Burnley Embankment]], a {{convert|1350|yd|m|0}} long and up to {{convert|60|ft|m|0}} high earthwork. It would also require another {{convert|559|yd|m|0}} tunnel nearby at Gannow and a sizeable cutting to allow the canal to traverse the hillside between the two. It took 5 years to complete this work, with the embankment alone costing £22,000, about £1.55 million in 2014 (comparing the historic opportunity cost of £22,000 in 1801 with 2014).<ref>{{cite book | first=Brian |last=Hall| title=Burnley: A Short History| year=1977 | publisher=Burnley Historical Society | location=Burnley | isbn=0-9500695-3-1 | pages=40}}</ref> [[Robert Whitworth (canal engineer)|Whitworth]] died aged 64, on 30 March 1799 and Samuel Fletcher, previously the inspector of works took over as engineer.<ref>{{harvnb |Skempton |2002 |pp=230, 781}}</ref> Once the Burnley work was completed, the canal opened to Enfield near Accrington in 1801.<ref name = "llcs"/> It would be another 9 years until it reached Blackburn only 4 miles away. Following the [[French Revolution]], Britain had been at [[French Revolutionary Wars|war with France]] from 1793 to 1802. The peace proved temporary, with the [[Napoleonic Wars]] beginning the following year. High taxes and interest rates during this period made it difficult for the company to borrow money, and the pace of construction inevitably slowed.