Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Linford Christie
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Positive drugs test and ban from athletics ==== In February 1999, Christie competed in an indoor meet in [[Dortmund]], Germany. A routine in competition drug test found the banned substance [[nandrolone]]. After a six-month delay, a disciplinary hearing was convened by the [[UK Athletics|British Athletic Federation]] which found Christie to be not guilty. But the [[IAAF]] overruled and confirmed a two-year suspension. He was found to have more than 100 times threshold levels of the metabolites of nandrolone in his urine. Various explanations were offered to explain the result.<ref>Professor Ron Maughan, [[University of Aberdeen]]. [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15467106 Contamination of supplements: an interview with professor Ron Maughan by Louise M. Burke] [[PubMed]] Retrieved 2009-01-20</ref><ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/in_depth/2000/drugs_in_sport/863386.stm Moorcroft backs medical research] [[BBC Sport]] (2 August 2000) Retrieved on 2009-01-20</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Tseng |first1=Y. L. |last2=Kuo |first2=F. H. |last3=Sun |first3=K. H. |year=2005 |title=Quantification and profiling of 19-norandrosterone and 19-noretiocholanolone in human urine after consumption of a nutritional supplement and norsteroids |journal=Journal of Analytical Toxicology |volume=29 |issue=2 |pages=124β134 |doi= 10.1093/jat/29.2.124|pmid=15902981 |doi-access=free }}</ref> "You think that's an awful lot," says Professor Ron Maughan one of the UK Athletics anti-doping panellists who worked on Christie's case, "but the amounts are so small, they would have absolutely no physiological effect, but they would trigger a doping test.".<ref>[https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/athletics/articles/c035805y52mo] [[BBC Sport]] (20 July 2024)</ref> The [[International Amateur Athletic Federation|IAAF]] rejected the explanations and gave Christie a two-years ban from athletics, despite [[UK Athletics]] feeling that there was reasonable doubt whether the drug had been taken deliberately, a decision which ignored the usual drug testing principle of "strict liability".<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/athletics/889694.stm British trio rocked by doping bans] [[BBC Sport]] (21 August 2000) Retrieved on 2009-01-20</ref> Several alternative theories have been proposed that might explain Christie's positive test. [[Nandrolone]] is a long-acting [[anabolic steroid]], and is well-known in athlete circles to be detectable in blood and urine screenings for long periods; ranging from 6 to 18 months.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Ayotte |first1=C. |title=Significance of 19-norandrosterone in athletes' urine samples |year=2006 |volume=40 |issue=Suppl 1 |pages=i25βi29 |journal=British Journal of Sports Medicine |doi=10.1136/bjsm.2006.028027 |pmid=16799098 |pmc=2657496 }}</ref> Sceptics of Christie's positive, and other [[Nandrolone]] sanctions in the late 1990s, have cited this detection window as a major deterrent to using the drug at any point during training or competition periods. Around this time [[Androgen prohormone|pro-hormones]] like [[Bolandione|19-norandrostenedione]], [[Androstenedione]], and [[1-Testosterone]], among others, abounded in the American supplement market, and were not yet codified as '[[anabolic agents]]' under the [[Controlled Substances Act|Federal Controlled Substances Act]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Brown |first1=G.A. |last2=Vukovich |first2=M. |last3=King |first3=D.S. |title=Testosterone prohormone supplements |journal=Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise |year=2006 |volume=38 |issue=8 |pages=1451β61 |publisher=Medical Science of Sport and Exercise |doi=10.1249/01.mss.0000228928.69512.2e |pmid=16888459 |doi-access=free }}</ref> Christie has always denied any wrongdoing. "If I took drugs there had to be a reason to take drugs. I had pretty much retired from the sport." Furthermore, he denied that his physique was gained through drug use and promoted an anti-steroid approach: "It does not follow that all athletes who are big take drugs ... Only by testing all athletes will the sport be kept clean of drugs."<ref name="autogenerated1" />
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)