Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Little Albert experiment
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Albert Barger=== The identity claimed by Beck, et al., has been contested by psychology researchers Russ Powell, Nancy Digdon and Ben Harris, who offer an alternative identity based on available data.<ref name="Correcting" /><ref name="Digdon" /> Albert Barger had been born within a day of Merritte, and his mother had also worked at the hospital where the experiment was conducted. In addition, his body weight and developmental condition closely matched the experiment's documentation of the subject baby's condition.<ref name="Search" /> Moreover, according to Watson and Rayner (1920), Little Albert was 12 months and 21 days the last day of the experiment when "he was taken from the hospital" (p. 12), the exact age Albert Barger had been when he left the hospital.<ref>Powell, et al., 2014, p. 603</ref> Finally, when Powell et al. were allowed to independently verify Douglas Merritte's clinical file, it was revealed that he was "completely blind",<ref>Powell, et al., 2014, p. 607</ref> which is at odds with the experiment's films where Little Albert engages in probable instances of object-directed action and social referencing. Through the use of a professional genealogist, the researchers learned Barger had died in 2007 at age 87 and identified one close living relative, a niece. In an interview, Barger's niece stated that she and her uncle had been quite close throughout his life, and acknowledged Barger's antipathy toward dogs as a well-known fact that family members, particularly his wife, would tease him about (the researchers noted there was no way to determine whether or not this behavior was linked to Watson's experiment). She also informed researchers of her uncle's aversion to animals in general, not just dogs. Though it was not a particularly strong aversion, family members would often have to keep their dogs in a separate room when he visited.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Powell |first1=Russell A. |last2=Digdon |first2=Nancy |last3=Harris |first3=Ben |last4=Smithson |first4=Christopher |title=Correcting the record on Watson, Rayner, and Little Albert: Albert Barger as "Psychology's lost boy". |url=https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Fa0036854 |journal=[[American Psychologist]] |publisher=American Psychological Association |pages=600β611 |doi=10.1037/a0036854 |date=2014|volume=69 |issue=6 |pmid=25197838 |url-access=subscription }}</ref> Outside of this, Barger's niece stated that she did not recall any other phobias he may have had. The researchers concluded that Barger would have been unaware of his role as an infant test subject.<ref name="Whatever" />
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)