Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Mohamed Al-Fayed
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Cash-for-questions=== In 1994, in what became known as the [[cash-for-questions affair]], Fayed revealed the names of MPs he had paid to ask questions in [[Houses of Parliament|Parliament]] on his behalf, but who had failed to declare their fees. It saw [[Conservative Party (UK)|Conservative]] MPs [[Neil Hamilton (politician)|Neil Hamilton]] and [[Tim Smith (UK politician)|Tim Smith]] leave the government in disgrace, and a [[Committee on Standards in Public Life]] established to prevent such corruption occurring again. Fayed also revealed that cabinet minister [[Jonathan Aitken]] stayed for free at the Ritz Hotel in Paris at the same time as a group of Saudi arms dealers, leading to Aitken's unsuccessful libel case and later imprisonment for [[perjury]].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/196466.stm|title=UK Politics: Talking Politics, Neil Hamilton β A chronology|work=[[BBC News]]|date=19 October 1998|access-date=13 November 2022|archive-date=3 April 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240403043705/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/196466.stm|url-status=live}}</ref> During this period, Al-Fayed's spokesman was [[Michael Cole (public relations)|Michael Cole]], a former [[BBC]] journalist.<ref>{{cite news |first=Steve |last=Boggan |date=21 February 1998 |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/conspiracies-abound-as-cole-quits-toughest-job-in-pr-1145917.html |title=Conspiracies abound as Cole quits 'toughest job in PR' |work=[[The Independent]] |url-access=registration |access-date=5 September 2017 |archive-date=4 April 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190404021109/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/conspiracies-abound-as-cole-quits-toughest-job-in-pr-1145917.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Hamilton lost a libel action against Al-Fayed in December 1999<ref>{{cite news |first1=Matt |last1=Wells |first2=Jamie |last2=Wilson |first3=David |last3=Pallister |date=22 December 1999 |url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk/1999/dec/22/hamiltonvalfayed.conservatives |title=A greedy, corrupt liar |work=[[The Guardian]] |access-date=12 December 2016 |archive-date=11 February 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170211081833/https://www.theguardian.com/uk/1999/dec/22/hamiltonvalfayed.conservatives |url-status=live }}</ref> and an appeal against the verdict in December 2000.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2000/dec/21/hamiltonvalfayed |title=Neil Hamilton loses libel appeal |work=[[The Guardian]] |date=21 December 2000 |access-date=12 December 2016 |archive-date=10 May 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170510191751/https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2000/dec/21/hamiltonvalfayed |url-status=live }}</ref> The former MP has always denied that he was paid by Al-Fayed for asking questions in Parliament. Hamilton's libel action related to a [[Channel 4]] ''[[Dispatches (TV series)|Dispatches]]'' documentary broadcast on 16 January 1997<ref>[https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199798/cmselect/cmstnprv/030ii/sp0157.htm "Appendix 33 β continued: Appendix 1 Channel 4 and Fourth Estate Press Releases"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161027120524/http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199798/cmselect/cmstnprv/030ii/sp0157.htm |date=27 October 2016 }}, Select Committee on Standards and Privileges First Report, House of Commons, January 1997</ref> in which Al-Fayed stated that the MP had received up to Β£110,000 in cash and other gratuities for asking parliamentary questions.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/573630.stm |title=Hamilton loses libel case |work=[[BBC News]] |date=21 December 1999 |access-date=13 November 2022 |archive-date=12 September 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230912221014/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/573630.stm |url-status=live }}</ref> Hamilton's basis for his appeal was that the original verdict was invalid because Al-Fayed had paid Β£10,000 for documents stolen from the dustbins of Hamilton's legal representatives by [[Benjamin Pell]].<ref>{{cite news |first=Steven |last=Moss |date=12 December 2000 |url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2000/dec/12/hamiltonvalfayed.stevenmorris |title=Fayed 'paid for stolen papers' |work=[[The Guardian]] |access-date=12 December 2016 |archive-date=10 May 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170510193021/https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2000/dec/12/hamiltonvalfayed.stevenmorris |url-status=live }}</ref> In 2003 Fayed moved from [[Surrey]] to Switzerland, alleging a breach in an agreement with [[Inland Revenue|the British tax authority]]. In 2005, he moved back to Britain, saying that he "regards Britain as home".<ref name="BBC20080407" /> He moored a yacht called the ''[[Sokar (yacht)|Sokar]]'' in [[Monaco]] prior to selling it in 2014.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://holiday.monacoeye.com/monaco_yacht_show.php |title=Monaco Yacht Show |publisher=Holiday |access-date=22 August 2010 |archive-date=3 August 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100803045035/http://holiday.monacoeye.com/monaco_yacht_show.php |url-status=dead }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)