Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Molecular phylogenetics
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Limitations== Molecular systematics is an essentially [[Cladistics|cladistic]] approach: it assumes that classification must correspond to phylogenetic descent, and that all valid taxa must be [[monophyletic]]. This is a limitation when attempting to determine the optimal tree(s), which often involves bisecting and reconnecting portions of the phylogenetic tree(s). The recent discovery of extensive [[horizontal gene transfer]] among organisms provides a significant complication to molecular systematics, indicating that different genes within the same organism can have different phylogenies. HGTs can be detected and excluded using a number of phylogenetic methods (see {{section link|Inferring horizontal gene transfer|Explicit phylogenetic methods}}). In addition, molecular phylogenies are sensitive to the assumptions and models that go into making them. Firstly, sequences must be aligned; then, issues such as [[long-branch attraction]], [[saturation (genetic)|saturation]], and [[taxon]] sampling problems must be addressed. This means that strikingly different results can be obtained by applying different models to the same dataset.<ref>{{cite journal | doi = 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlz088| title = Exploring the impact of morphology, multiple sequence alignment and choice of optimality criteria in phylogenetic inference: A case study with the Neotropical orb-weaving spider genus Wagneriana (Araneae: Araneidae)| journal = Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society| year = 2020| volume = 188 | issue = 4 | pages = 976–1151 | last1 = Cabra-García| first1 = Jimmy| last2 = Hormiga| first2 = Gustavo}}</ref><ref name="Philippe2011">{{Cite journal |last1=Philippe |first1=H. |last2=Brinkmann |first2=H. |last3=Lavrov |first3=D. V. |last4=Littlewood |first4=D. T. J. |last5=Manuel |first5=M. |last6=Wörheide |first6=G. |last7=Baurain |first7=D. |editor1-last=Penny |editor1-first=David |title=Resolving Difficult Phylogenetic Questions: Why More Sequences Are Not Enough |doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.1000602 |journal=PLOS Biology |volume=9 |issue=3 |pages=e1000602 |year=2011 |pmid=21423652 |pmc=3057953 |doi-access=free }}</ref> The tree-building method also brings with it specific assumptions about tree topology, evolution speeds, and sampling. The simplistic UPGMA assumes a rooted tree and a uniform molecular clock, both of which can be incorrect.<ref name="Pevsner" /> The low resolution power of single genes have been overcome using [[Computational phylogenetics#Multigene phylogeny|multigene phylogenies]], though the issue of HGT still merits careful algorithmic design.<ref>{{cite web |title=Part 4: Multigene phylogenetics |url=https://web.natur.cuni.cz/~vlada/moltax/part4.html |website=web.natur.cuni.cz |language=en}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)