Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Muskogean languages
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Broader relationships=== ====Possible Muskogean languages==== Several sparsely attested languages have been claimed to be Muskogean languages. George Broadwell suggested that the languages of the [[Yamasee]] and [[Guale]] were Muskogean.<ref name="Campbell149">Campbell 1997, p. 149</ref><ref>Broadwell 1992, pp. 41β42, fn. 2</ref> However, William Sturtevant argued that the "Yamasee" and "Guale" data were Muscogee and that the language(s) spoken by the Yamasee and Guale people remain unknown.<ref>Sturtevant 1994, referenced in Campbell 1997, p. 149</ref> It is possible that the Yamasee were an amalgamation of several different ethnic groups and did not speak a single language. Chester B. DePratter describes the Yamasee as consisting mainly of speakers of Hitchiti and Guale.<ref>{{NRHP url|id=64500575|title=Dr. Chester B. DePratter, "The Foundation, Occupation, and Abandonment of Yamasee Indian Towns in the South Carolina Lowcountry, 1684β1715"}}, National Register Multiple Property Submission</ref> The historian Steven Oatis also describes the Yamasee as an ethnically mixed group that included people from Muskogean-speaking regions, such as the early colonial-era native towns of ''Hitchiti'', ''Coweta'', and ''Cussita''.<ref>{{cite book |last= Oatis |first= Steven J. |title= A Colonial Complex: South Carolina's Frontiers in the Era of the Yamasee War, 1680β1730 |year= 2004 |publisher= University of Nebraska Press |isbn= 0-8032-3575-5}}</ref> The [[Amacano people|Amacano]], [[Chacato]], [[Chine people|Chine]], Pacara, and [[Pensacola people|Pensacola]] people, who lived along the Gulf Coast of Florida from the [[Big Bend Coast]] to [[Pensacola Bay]], are reported to have spoken the same Muskogean language, which may have been closely related to Choctaw.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Hann |first=John H. |title=The Native American World Beyond Apalachee |publisher=University Press of Florida |year=2006 |isbn=9-780-8130-2982-5 |pages=11, 20β21, 24, 43}}</ref><ref>Milanich:95, 96</ref><ref>Coker:6</ref><ref>Swanton:136</ref> Sparse evidence indicates that a Muskogean language was spoken by at least some of the people of the paramount chiefdom of [[Cofitachequi]] in northeastern [[South Carolina]]. If so, that would be the most eastern outpost of Muskogean. The people of Cofitichequi were probably absorbed by nearby [[Siouan]] and [[Iroquoian]] speakers in the late 17th century.<ref>Hudson, Charles ''The Juan Pardo Expeditions'' Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1990, pp. 68β73, 75</ref> A vocabulary of the [[Houma Tribe|Houma]] may be another underdocumented Western Muskogean language or a version of [[Mobilian Jargon]], a pidgin based on Western Muskogean. ====Gulf==== {{main|Gulf languages}} The best-known connection proposed between Muskogean and other languages is [[Mary Haas]]' [[Gulf languages|Gulf hypothesis]], in which she conceived of a macrofamily comprising Muskogean and a number of [[language isolate]]s of the southeastern US: [[Atakapa language|Atakapa]], [[Chitimacha language|Chitimacha]], [[Tunica language|Tunica]], and [[Natchez language|Natchez]]. While well-known, the Gulf grouping is now generally rejected by historical linguists.<ref name="Campbell149" /><ref>Campbell 1997, pp. 305β09</ref> Some Muskogean scholars continue to believe that Muskogean is related to Natchez.<ref>Campbell 1997, p. 305</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)