Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Norrington Table
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Criticisms == The table is biased towards colleges with above average proportions of students in science subjects such as chemistry and mathematics,<ref>{{cite web|last1=Stokes|first1=Matt|last2=Lewis|first2=Alis|last3=Restall|first3=James|title=Merton plummet in latest Norrington Table|url=http://oxfordstudent.com/2012/08/16/magdalen-top-dogs-in-norrington-table/|website=The Oxford Student|accessdate=16 June 2017|date=16 August 2012}}</ref> in which a higher proportion attain a first-class degree compared to humanities (in which more students attain a 2:1). The corresponding [[Tompkins Table]] at Cambridge makes an adjustment for this feature. [[John Lucas (philosopher)|John Lucas]], Fellow of [[Merton College, Oxford|Merton]], presented a critique of the Norrington Table in a 1980 article titled "Norrington Blues".<ref>Lucas, John R., [http://users.ox.ac.uk/~jrlucas/itolduso/norrblue.html "Norrington Blues"], ''Oxford'' (May 1980), pp. 45β49.</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)