Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Nowhere dense set
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Nowhere dense sets with positive measure == A nowhere dense set is not necessarily negligible in every sense. For example, if <math>X</math> is the [[unit interval]] <math>[0, 1],</math> not only is it possible to have a dense set of [[Lebesgue measure]] zero (such as the set of rationals), but it is also possible to have a nowhere dense set with positive measure. One such example is the [[Smith–Volterra–Cantor set]]. For another example (a variant of the [[Cantor set]]), remove from <math>[0, 1]</math> all [[dyadic fraction]]s, i.e. fractions of the form <math>a/2^n</math> in [[lowest terms]] for positive integers <math>a, n \in \N,</math> and the intervals around them: <math>\left(a/2^n - 1/2^{2n+1}, a/2^n + 1/2^{2n+1}\right).</math> Since for each <math>n</math> this removes intervals adding up to at most <math>1/2^{n+1},</math> the nowhere dense set remaining after all such intervals have been removed has measure of at least <math>1/2</math> (in fact just over <math>0.535\ldots</math> because of overlaps<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.se16.info/hgb/nowhere.htm| title = Some nowhere dense sets with positive measure and a strictly monotonic continuous function with a dense set of points with zero derivative}}</ref>) and so in a sense represents the majority of the ambient space <math>[0, 1].</math> This set is nowhere dense, as it is closed and has an empty interior: any interval <math>(a, b)</math> is not contained in the set since the dyadic fractions in <math>(a, b)</math> have been removed. Generalizing this method, one can construct in the unit interval nowhere dense sets of any measure less than <math>1,</math> although the measure cannot be exactly 1 (because otherwise the complement of its closure would be a nonempty open set with measure zero, which is impossible).<ref>{{Cite book|last=Folland|first=G. B.|url=http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.49015000929258|title=Real analysis: modern techniques and their applications|publisher=John Wiley & Sons|year=1984|isbn=0-471-80958-6|location=New York|pages=41|hdl=2027/mdp.49015000929258}}</ref> For another simpler example, if <math>U</math> is any dense open subset of <math>\R</math> having finite [[Lebesgue measure]] then <math>\R \setminus U</math> is necessarily a closed subset of <math>\R</math> having infinite Lebesgue measure that is also nowhere dense in <math>\R</math> (because its topological interior is empty). Such a dense open subset <math>U</math> of finite Lebesgue measure is commonly constructed when proving that the Lebesgue measure of the rational numbers <math>\Q</math> is <math>0.</math> This may be done by choosing any [[bijection]] <math>f : \N \to \Q</math> (it actually suffices for <math>f : \N \to \Q</math> to merely be a [[surjection]]) and for every <math>r > 0,</math> letting <math display="block">U_r ~:=~ \bigcup_{n \in \N} \left(f(n) - r/2^n, f(n) + r/2^n\right) ~=~ \bigcup_{n \in \N} f(n) + \left(- r/2^n, r/2^n\right)</math> (here, the [[Minkowski sum]] notation <math>f(n) + \left(- r/2^n, r/2^n\right) := \left(f(n) - r/2^n, f(n) + r/2^n\right)</math> was used to simplify the description of the intervals). The open subset <math>U_r</math> is dense in <math>\R</math> because this is true of its subset <math>\Q</math> and its Lebesgue measure is no greater than <math>\sum_{n \in \N} 2 r / 2^n = 2 r.</math> Taking the union of closed, rather than open, intervals produces the [[Fσ set|F<sub>{{sigma}}</sub>-subset]] <math display="block">S_r ~:=~ \bigcup_{n \in \N} f(n) + \left[- r/2^n, r/2^n\right]</math> that satisfies <math>S_{r/2} \subseteq U_r \subseteq S_r \subseteq U_{2r}.</math> Because <math>\R \setminus S_r</math> is a subset of the nowhere dense set <math>\R \setminus U_r,</math> it is also nowhere dense in <math>\R.</math> Because <math>\R</math> is a [[Baire space]], the set <math display="block">D := \bigcap_{m=1}^{\infty} U_{1/m} = \bigcap_{m=1}^{\infty} S_{1/m}</math> is a dense subset of <math>\R</math> (which means that like its subset <math>\Q,</math> <math>D</math> cannot possibly be nowhere dense in <math>\R</math>) with <math>0</math> Lebesgue measure that is also a [[Nonmeager set|nonmeager subset]] of <math>\R</math> (that is, <math>D</math> is of the [[second category]] in <math>\R</math>), which makes <math>\R \setminus D</math> a [[Comeager set|comeager subset]] of <math>\R</math> whose interior in <math>\R</math> is also empty; however, <math>\R \setminus D</math> is nowhere dense in <math>\R</math> if and only if its {{em|closure}} in <math>\R</math> has empty interior. The subset <math>\Q</math> in this example can be replaced by any countable dense subset of <math>\R</math> and furthermore, even the set <math>\R</math> can be replaced by <math>\R^n</math> for any integer <math>n > 0.</math>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)