Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
OSF/1
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== OSF/2 == OSF/2, a successor to OSF/1, was described as being based on the TMach system developed by [[Trusted Information Systems]].<ref name="computerworld19900514_mach">{{ cite magazine | url=https://archive.org/details/computerworld2420unse/page/97/mode/1up | title=Move over, Unix: Here comes Mach! | magazine=Computerworld | last1=Anthes | first1=Gary H. | date=14 May 1990 | access-date=15 April 2024 | pages=97–98 }}</ref> TMach, or Trusted Mach, was an operating system architecture incorporating the OSF Mach MK++ kernel, introducing a trusted computing base layer consisting of trusted server components, hosting an application layer in which untrusted programs would run.<ref name="ida199711_p3375">{{ cite tech report | url=https://archive.org/details/DTIC_ADA349992/page/66/mode/2up | title=Assessing DoD Goal Security Architecture (DGSA) Support in Commercially Available Operating Systems and Hardware Platforms | publisher=Institute for Defense Analyses | date=November 1997 | access-date=15 April 2024 | last1=Schneider | first1=Edward A. | last2=Feustel | first2=Edward A. | last3=Ross | first3=Ronald S. | pages=66-67 }}</ref> In 1989, HP announced plans to merge the software platforms of its own products and those of newly acquired Apollo Computer to form a single OSF/2-compliant platform to be delivered by 1992.<ref name="hpprofessional198907_apollo"/> Other interpretations of the OSF/2 name were associated with various plans to remove AT&T-licensed code from early forms of OSF/1 and the Mach kernel in particular,<ref name="unigramx19900514_osf">{{ cite news | url=https://archive.org/details/UnigramX1990263-313/page/n128/mode/1up | title=OSF Solidifies Plans to Purge AT&T Code | work=Unigram/X | date=14 May 1990 | access-date=25 July 2024 | pages=1 }}</ref> leading to speculation that a system based on the [[Chorus Systèmes SA|Chorus]] microkernel might supplant Mach entirely and become OSF/2 itself.<ref name="unigramx19910903_osf">{{ cite news | url=https://archive.org/details/UnigramX1990263-313/page/n230/mode/1up | title=Micro-Kernel, Real-Time Chorus is "Future of Unix" AT&T and Open Software Foundation Talks in Progress | work=Unigram/X | date=3 September 1990 | access-date=25 July 2024 | pages=1 }}</ref> With such a Chorus-based architecture having been rejected in favour of the Mach 3.0 microkernel, the OSF/2 designation persisted in reporting of this particular form of OSF/1.<ref name="unigramx19910527_osf">{{ cite news | url=https://archive.org/details/UnigramX1991314-365/page/n131/mode/1up | title=AT&T code-free Mach 3.0 is now shipping to computer vendors | work=Unigram/X | last1=O'Gara | first1=Maureen | date=27 May 1991 | access-date=25 July 2024 | pages=2 }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)