Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Pacifier
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Prevalence of attachments to pacifiers and their psychological functions== In the late 1960s researchers dispelled the notion that pacifiers were psychologically unhealthy and aberrant. Richard H. Passman and Jane S. Halonen at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee traced the developmental course of attachments to pacifiers and provided norms.<ref name="Passman, R. H. 1979">{{cite journal |last1=Passman |first1=R. H. |last2=Halonen |first2=J. S. |year=1979 |title=A developmental survey of young children's attachments to inanimate objects |journal=Journal of Genetic Psychology |volume=134 |issue=2 |pages=165β178 |doi=10.1080/00221325.1979.10534051}}</ref> They found that 66% of their sample of babies who were three months old in the United States demonstrated at least some attachment, according to their mothers. At six months of age, this incidence was 40%, and at nine months it was 44%. Thereafter, the rate of attachment to pacifiers dropped precipitously until, at 24 months of age and later, it was quite rare. These researchers also provided experimental support for what were then only anecdotal observations that pacifiers do indeed pacify babies.<ref>{{cite journal |last2=Passman |first2=R. H. |last1=Halonen |first1=J. S. |year=1978 |title=Pacifiers' effects upon play and separations from the mother for the one-year-old in a novel environment |journal=Infant Behavior and Development |volume=1 |pages=70β78 |doi=10.1016/S0163-6383(78)80010-1}}</ref> In an unfamiliar playroom, one-year-old toddlers accompanied by their pacifier evidenced more play and demonstrated less distress than did babies without them. The investigators concluded that pacifiers should be considered to be attachment objects, similar to other security objects like blankets. Passman and Halonen<ref name="Passman, R. H. 1979"/> contended that the widespread occurrence of attachments to pacifiers as well as their importance as security objects should reassure parents that they are a normal part of development for a majority of infants and toddlers.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)