Editing Political realignment (section)

===Political realignment in United States history===

* [[1800 United States presidential election|1800 presidential election]] — [[Thomas Jefferson]]
** This election completed the turnover of power in the [[First Party System]] from the [[Federalist Party]], led by [[Alexander Hamilton]], to Jefferson and his [[Democratic-Republican Party]]. The center of power shifted from New England to the South and [[Jeffersonian democracy]] became the dominant ideology.
** Republicans gained 19.7% of House seats in 1800, 9.4% in 1802 and 9.7% in 1804, for a total gain of 38.8% in 3 elections.
** As late as 1812, the Federalists came within one state of winning. A larger shift in electoral politics arguably came in the 1812–1816 period, as the Federalists became discredited after opposing the [[War of 1812]].
* [[1828 United States presidential election|1828 presidential election]] — [[Andrew Jackson]]
** This election redefined the party system in the United States, setting up the [[Second Party System]], which was dominated by [[Jacksonian democracy]]. The Democratic-Republicans split into two parties, later renamed as the [[History of the United States Democratic Party|Democratic Party]] and the [[Whig Party (United States)|Whig Party]]. The Democrats were led by [[Andrew Jackson]] of Tennessee and [[Martin Van Buren]] of New York. By 1834 the Whigs emerged as the opposition to Andrew Jackson, led by [[Henry Clay]] of Kentucky.<ref name="silbey">Silbey (1991)</ref>
* [[1860 United States presidential election|1860 presidential election]] — [[Abraham Lincoln]]
** After the Whigs collapsed after 1852, party alignments were in turmoil, with several third parties, such as the [[Know Nothing]]s and the [[Opposition Party (Southern U.S.)|Opposition Party]]. The system stabilized in 1858 and the presidential election marked the ascendence of the [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican Party]]. Abraham Lincoln beat out three other contenders — but even if they had somehow united he still had the majority of the electoral vote. The Republican party was pledged to the long-term ending of slavery, which was proximate cause of secession. Republicans rallied around nationalism in 1861 and fought the [[American Civil War]] to end secession. During the war the Republicans, under Lincoln's leadership, switched to a goal of short-term ending of slavery.<ref name="silbey"/> By 1864, the Republicans had a coalition built around followers of the "free labor" ideology, as well as soldiers and veterans of the [[Union Army]]. (Since then, the military establishment has favored the Republicans.){{citation needed|date= June 2023}}
*** The Republican Party went from 18.3% of the House in 1854, to 38.0% in 1856, 48.7% in 1858, and 59.0% in 1860, for a total gain of 40.7% in 4 elections.<ref>Michael F. Holt, ''The Political Crisis of the 1850s'' (1978)</ref>
* [[1896 United States presidential election|1896 presidential election]] — [[William McKinley]]
** The status of this election is hotly disputed; some political scientists, such as Jerome Clubb, do not consider it a realigning election. Other political scientists and historians, such as Kleppner and Burnham consider this the ultimate realignment and emphasize that the rules of the game had changed, the leaders were new, voting alignments had changed, and a whole new set of issues came to dominance as the old Civil War-era issues faded away. Funding from office holders was replaced by outside fundraising from business in 1896 — a major shift in political history. Furthermore, McKinley's tactics in beating [[William Jennings Bryan]] (as developed by [[Mark Hanna]]) marked a sea change in the evolution of the modern campaign. McKinley raised a huge amount of money from business interests, outspending Bryan by 10 to 1. Bryan meanwhile invented the modern technique of campaigning heavily in closely contested states, the first candidate to do so.<ref>Robert J. Dinkin, ''Campaigning in America: A History of Election Practices'' (1989)</ref> Bryan's message of [[populism]] and class conflict marked a new direction for the Democrats. McKinley's victory in 1896 and repeat in 1900 was a triumph for [[pluralism (political philosophy)|pluralism]], as all sectors and groups shared in the new prosperity brought about by his policy of rapid industrial growth.<ref>Lewis L. Gould, "New Perspectives on the Republican Party, 1877–1913", ''American Historical Review'', Vol. 77, No. 4 (Oct., 1972), pp. 1074–1082</ref><ref>Burnham (1986)</ref>
** While Republicans lost House seats in 1896, this followed a massive two-election gain: from 25.9% in 1890 to 34.8% in 1892 and 71.1% in 1894, for a total 45.2% gain. Republicans lost 13.4% in 1896, but still held 57.7% of House seats.
** In terms of correlations among counties, the election of 1896 is a realignment flop, but this is only a problem if realignment is considered to occur in single elections. Rather, if realignment is thought of as a generational or long-term political movement, then change will occur over several elections, even if there is one "critical" election defining the new alignment. So, as pointed out above, the 1896 realignment really began around 1892, and the 130 seat GOP gain in 1894, the all-record for a house election, meant there were almost no seats left to pick up in 1896. However, the presidential election in 1896 is usually considered the start of the new alignment since the national election allowed the nation to make a more conscious decision about the future of industrial policy by selecting McKinley over Bryan, making this the defining election in the realignment.<ref name="Shafer1991"/> The [[1876 United States presidential election|election of 1876]] passes the numbers test much better compared to 1896 alone, and Mayhew (2004) argues it resulted in far more drastic changes in United States politics: Reconstruction came to a sudden halt, African-Americans in the South would soon be completely disenfranchised, and politicians began to focus on new issues (such as [[tariff]]s and civil service reform).
* [[1932 United States presidential election|1932 presidential election]] — [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]]
** Of all the realigning elections, this one musters the most agreement from political scientists and historians; it is the archetypal realigning election.<ref name="Shafer1991">Shafer (1991)</ref> FDR's admirers such as [[Arthur Schlesinger, Jr.]] have argued that [[New Deal]] policies, developed in response to the crash of 1929 and the miseries of the [[Great Depression]] under [[Herbert Hoover]], represented an entirely new phenomenon in American politics. More critical historians such as [[Carl Degler]] and [[David M. Kennedy (historian)|David Kennedy]] see a great deal of continuity with Hoover's energetic but unsuccessful economic policies. In many ways, Roosevelt's legacy still defines the Democratic Party; he forged an enduring [[New Deal Coalition]] of big city machines, the White South, intellectuals, [[labor union]]s, Catholics, Jews, and Westerners. In 1936, [[African-Americans]] were added to the coalition (African-Americans had previously been denied the vote or voted Republican). For instance, [[Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania|Pittsburgh]], which was a Republican stronghold from the [[American Civil War|Civil War]] up to this point, suddenly became a Democratic stronghold, and has elected a Democratic mayor to office in every election since this time.
** The Democrats went from controlling 37.7% of House seats in 1928 to 49.6% in 1930 and 71.9% in 1932, for a total gain of 34.2% in two elections.
** In the Senate, the Democrats went from controlling 40.6% of seats in 1928 to 49% in 1930 and 61.5% in 1932, for a total gain of 20.9% in two elections.