Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Poncelet–Steiner theorem
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Rusty compass === The '''rusty compass''' describes a compass whose hinge is so rusted as to be fused such that its legs - the needle and pencil - are unable to adjust width. In essence, it is a compass whose distance is fixed, and which draws circles of a predetermined and constant, but arbitrary radius. Circles may be drawn centered at any arbitrary point, but the radius is unchangeable. As a restricted construction paradigm, the ''rusty compass constructions'' allow the use of a straightedge and the fixed-width compass. The rusty compass equivalence: :''All points necessary to uniquely describe any compass-straightedge construction may be achieved with a straightedge and fixed-width compass.'' It is naturally understood that the arbitrary-radius compass may be used for aesthetic purposes; only the arc of one specific predetermined fixed-width compass may be used for construction. ==== As the rusty compass relates to the theorem ==== In some sense, the rusty compass is a generalization and simplification of the Poncelet-Steiner theorem. Though not more powerful, it is certainly more convenient. The Poncelet-Steiner theorem requires a single circle with arbitrary radius and center point to be placed in the plane. As it is the only drawn circle, whether or not it was drawn by a rusty compass is immaterial and equivalent. The benefit of general rusty compass constructions, however, is that the compass may be used repeatedly to redraw circles centered at any desired point, albeit with the same radius, thus simplifying many constructions. Naturally if all constructions are possible with a single circle arbitrarily placed in the plane, then the same can surely be said about a straightedge and rusty compass, with which at least one circle may be arbitrarily placed. It is known that a straightedge and a rusty compass is sufficient to construct all that is possible with straightedge and standard compass - with the implied understanding that circular arcs of arbitrary radii cannot be drawn, and only need be drawn for aesthetic purposes rather than constructive ones. Historically this was proven when the Poncelet-Steiner theorem was proven, which is a stronger result. The rusty compass, therefore, is no weaker than the Poncelet-Steiner theorem. It should also be intuitively clear that a rusty compass cannot be any stronger than a standard compass. As the rusty compass is at least as strong as the circle and no stronger than the standard compass, and the latter two are proven equivalent by the Poncelet-Steiner theorem, so too must the rusty compass be equivalent. The Poncelet-Steiner theorem reduces Ferrari's rusty compass equivalence, a claim at the time, to a single-use compass: :''All points necessary to uniquely describe any compass-straightedge construction may be achieved with only a straightedge, once the first circle has been placed.'' The Poncelet-Steiner theorem takes the rusty compass scenario, and breaks the compass completely after its first use. There is a subtle distinction, however, which makes the single use rusty compass slightly more useful. With a single-use compass, the [[geometer]] may place the first circle arbitrarily, as it suits convenience, even after other constructions have begun. The Poncelet-Steiner theorem, on the other hand, presumes the geometer has no control over the placement of the circle or over the constructions undertaken, making the two independent.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)