Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Portland Building
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Reception== In May 1983, the building won an [[American Institute of Architects]] honor award.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |editor-last=Dickey |editor-first=Norma H. |year= 1984 |encyclopedia=Funk & Wagnalls New Encyclopedia |publisher=Funk & Wagnalls Publishing Company, Inc. |location=[[New York, New York|New York]] | isbn=978-0-8343-0069-9 |title=Yearbook 1984}}</ref> The building's style remains controversial among Portlanders as well as the entire architecture field.<ref name="thirty"/> In 1990, ''[[The Oregonian]]'' stated "it's hard to find anyone who doesn't like [[Pioneer Courthouse Square]].... it's even harder to find anyone who admits to liking the Portland Building."<ref name="thirty" /> Nearly a quarter century later, ''Oregonian'' columnist [[David Sarasohn]] revisited the theme, noting that the "huge blue tiles, colored glass and odd pastel flourishes meant to evoke early modern French paintings" actually resembled "something designed by a Third World dictator's mistress' art-student brother."<ref>Sarasohn, David (February 5, 2014). "The Portland Building: A Façade Too Weird for Even Portlandia". ''The Oregonian''. p. B4.</ref> These laypersons' appraisals were bolstered by Italian-born modernist architect [[Pietro Belluschi]], who called the building "totally wrong" and declared: "It's not architecture, it's packaging. I said at the time that there were only two good things about it: 'It will put Portland on the map, architecturally, and it will never be repeated.'"<ref name="thirty" /> Not all commentary has been negative. In the estimation of architectural critic [[Paul Goldberger]]: "For better or for worse, the Portland Building overshadows other things. It is more significant for what it did than how well it does it. It had a profound effect on American architecture and brought a return to classicism that brought us better buildings."<ref name="thirty" /> In October 2009, ''[[Travel + Leisure]]'' magazine called the Portland Building "one of the most hated buildings in America".<ref>{{cite news| first=Bunny| last=Wong| title=The World's Ugliest Buildings| url=http://www.travelandleisure.com/articles/the-worlds-ugliest-buildings/1/| magazine=Travel + Leisure| date=October 2009| accessdate=October 18, 2010| archive-date=October 12, 2010| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101012091149/http://www.travelandleisure.com/articles/the-worlds-ugliest-buildings/1| url-status=live}}</ref> DLR Group's reconstruction work on the building was recognized with an [[American Architecture Awards|American Architecture Award]] in 2021.<ref>{{Cite web |title=DLR Group Earns Two American Architecture Awards |url=https://www.dlrgroup.com/firm-news/2021-american-architecture-awards/ |access-date=2024-02-14 |website=DLR Group |language=en-US |archive-date=2024-02-14 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240214164021/https://www.dlrgroup.com/firm-news/2021-american-architecture-awards/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)