Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Pre-existence
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Christianity== {{Origenism}} {{See also|Pre-existence of Christ}} A concept of pre-existence was advanced by [[Origen]], a second and third-century [[church father]].<ref>[http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/basis/const2.html Medieval Sourcebook: Fifth Ecumenical Council: Constantinople II, 553]. [[Fordham University]], 1996. </ref> Origen believed that each human soul was created by God<ref>{{cite book |author=Origen |title=De Principiis |url=http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/origen122.html |volume=I.V.3 |quote=let us inquire whether God, the creator and founder of all things, created certain of them holy and happy, so that they could admit no element at all of an opposite kind, and certain others so that they were made capable both of virtue and vice; or whether we are to suppose that He created some so as to be altogether incapable of virtue, and others again altogether incapable of wickedness, but with the power of abiding only in a state of happiness, and others again such as to be capable of either condition.}}</ref> at some time prior to conception. He wrote that already "one of [his] predecessors" had interpreted the Scripture to teach pre-existence, which seems to be a reference to the Jewish philosopher [[Philo]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Chadwick |first1=Henry |title=Origen: Contra Celsum |date=1953 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=0-521-29576-9 |page=307}}</ref> Some scholars, including [[John Behr]] and [[Marguerite Harl]], argue that this idea, condemned by the church, may have been taught by some later [[Origenism|Origenists]], but that Origen himself was [[Orthodoxy|orthodox]] in this regard and "never used the terms 'pre-existence of souls' or 'pre-existent intellects', and that Origen was talking about realities outside of time and not about any concept of temporality before our time.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.firstthings.com/article/2018/12/orthodox-origen |title=Orthodox Origen |author=Joseph T. Lienhard |date=December 2018 |website=[[First Things]] |access-date=12 February 2023 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221225112550/https://www.firstthings.com/article/2018/12/orthodox-origen |archive-date=25 December 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |author=Origen of Alexandria|author-link=Origen |translator-last1=Behr |translator-first1=John |translator-link1=John Behr |chapter=Introduction |title=Origen: On First Principles (Oxford Early Christian Texts) |publication-place=Oxford, UK |publisher=Oxford University Press |publication-date=7 February 2018 |isbn=9780199684021 }}</ref> Such orthodox understandings of Origen also show up in [[Maximus the Confessor]] and in the idea of an [[atemporal fall]] as taught by Christian theologians [[Sergei Bulgakov]] and [[David Bentley Hart]].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://davidbentleyhart.substack.com/p/sensus-plenior-i/comments |url-access=subscription |title=Sensus Plenior I: On gods and mortals |last=Hart |first=David Bentley |author-link=David Bentley Hart |date=31 August 2022 |website=Leaves in the Wind |access-date=5 February 2023 |quote=First Reader (Aug 31, 2022): Should we favor the ‘atemporal fall’ view then? David Bentley Hart (Aug 31, 2022): Well, I certainly do. But the original Eden story isn't about the ‘fall’ at all, except in the vague sense that it was a mythic aetiology of life's miseries. Second Reader (Sep 2, 2022): Can you briefly describe what you understand or hold the ‘atemporal fall’ to be? Hart (Sep 2, 2022): No, not briefly. Second Reader (Sep 2, 2022): An extended response would, of course, be satisfactory also! But no, if you are aware of any particularly good reflections on it, I’d be grateful for a reference. Hart (Sep 2, 2022): Bulgakov, The Bride of the Lamb}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://afkimel.wordpress.com/2017/05/01/sergius-bulgakov-on-evolution-and-the-fall-a-sophiological-solution/ |title=Sergius Bulgakov on Evolution and the Fall: A Sophiological Solution |last=Gottshall |first=Charles Andrew |date=1 May 2017 |website=Eclectic Orthodoxy |access-date=9 February 2023 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221202030046/https://afkimel.wordpress.com/2017/05/01/sergius-bulgakov-on-evolution-and-the-fall-a-sophiological-solution/ |archive-date=2 December 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://afkimel.wordpress.com/2018/01/15/origen-and-the-eschatological-creation-of-the-cosmos/ |title=Origen and the Eschatological Creation of the Cosmos |last=Behr |first=John |author-link=John Behr |date=15 January 2018 |website=Eclectic Orthodoxy |access-date=5 February 2023 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230124131351/https://afkimel.wordpress.com/2018/01/15/origen-and-the-eschatological-creation-of-the-cosmos/ |archive-date=24 January 2023 |quote=Our beginning in this world and its time can only be thought of as a falling away from that eternal and heavenly reality, to which we are called.}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://issuu.com/jacobswell/docs/jacob_s_well_spring_2022_online_1_ |title=The Redemption of Evolution: Maximus the Confessor, The Incarnation, and Modern Science |last=Chenoweth |first=Mark |date=Summer 2022 |website=Jacob’s Well |access-date=5 February 2023 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220814135608/https://issuu.com/jacobswell/docs/jacob_s_well_spring_2022_online_1_ |archive-date=14 August 2022}}</ref> Church Fathers [[Tertullian]] and [[Jerome]] held to [[traducianism]] and [[Creationism (soul)|creationism]], respectively, and pre-existence was condemned as heresy in the [[Second Council of Constantinople]] in AD 553.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf214.xii.ix.html|title=The Anathemas Against Origen}}</ref> Origen referenced Romans 9:11-14 as evidence for his position: {{blockquote| For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth; It was said unto her, The elder shall serve the younger. As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated. What shall we say then? Is there unrighteousness with God? God forbid. |source={{cite web|url=https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans%209%3A11-14&version=NIV|title=Romans 9: 11-14}} }} Origen argued that God could not love Jacob and hate Esau until Jacob had done something worthy of love and Esau had done something worthy of hatred and so the passage means only that Jacob and Esau had not yet done good or evil ''in this life'' and their conduct ''before'' this life was the reason why Esau would serve Jacob.<ref>{{cite book |author=Origen |title=Commentary on John |url=http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/origen-john2.html |volume=Book II, Section 25 |chapter=Argument from the Prayer of Joseph, to Show That the Baptist May Have Been an Angel Who Became a Man |quote=If, then, when they were not yet born, and had not done any-thing either good or evil, in order that God's purpose according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth, if at such a period this was said, how if we do not go back to the works done before this life, can it be said that there is no unrighteousness with God when the elder serves the younger and is hated (by God) before he has done anything worthy of slavery or of hatred? }}</ref> Origen also referenced Jeremiah 1:5: {{blockquote| Before I formed thee in the belly, I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb, I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations. }} He brought forth a question: {{blockquote| How could his soul and its images be formed along with his body, who, before he was created in the womb, is said to be known to God, and was sanctified by Him before his birth?<ref>{{cite book |author=Origen |title=De Principiis |url=http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/origen122.html |volume=I.VII.4}}</ref>}} Those who reject pre-existence, which would be every [[Christian denomination]] that accepts the conclusions of the [[Second Council of Constantinople]] (i.e., all [[Catholics]] and [[Eastern Orthodox Christians]] and many [[Protestants]]), simply see Jeremiah 1:5 as another passage about [[Attributes of God in Christianity#Omniscience|God's foreknowledge]]. This [[ecumenical Council]] explicitly stated "If anyone asserts the fabulous pre-existence of souls, and shall assert the monstrous restoration which follows from it: let him be [[anathema]]."<ref>{{cite web |title=The Anathemas against Origen |url=http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf214.xii.ix.html}}</ref> ===Latter-day Saints=== {{main|Premortal life (Latter Day Saints)}} {{see also|Mormon cosmology#Pre-mortality|Plan of salvation (Latter Day Saints)#Premortal life}} The concept of '''premortal life''' is an early and fundamental doctrine of [[Mormonism]].<ref name=PremortalSpirits>{{Cite journal |journal=[[Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought|Dialogue]] |publisher=[[University of Illinois Press]] |title=Premortal Spirits: Implications for Cloning, Abortion, Evolution, and Extinction |url=https://www.dialoguejournal.com/articles/premortal-spirits-implications-for-cloning-abortion-evolution-and-extinction/ |page=47 |last=Condie |first=Kent C. |volume=39 |issue=1 |date=Spring 2006}}</ref><ref name=Development>{{cite journal|last=Ostler|first=Blake|author-link=Blake Ostler|year=1982|title=The Idea of Pre-Existence in the Development of Mormon Thought|url=https://dialoguejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/sbi/articles/Dialogue_V15N01_61.pdf|journal=[[Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought|Dialogue]]|publisher=[[University of Illinois Press]]|volume=15|issue=1|pages=59,73–74}}</ref><ref name=Intelligences>{{cite thesis|title=Joseph Smith's Concept of Preexistent Intelligences: Development and Critique|url=https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1049&context=masters |institution=[[Liberty University]]|date=May 1999|degree=Master of Religion|last=Bowen|pages=5–7|first=David R. Sr.|location=Lynchburg, Virginia}}</ref> In the faith's eponymous text, the [[Book of Mormon]], published on March 26, 1830, the premortal spirit of Christ appears in human form and explains that individuals were created in the beginning in the image of Christ.<ref name=Intelligences/><ref>{{cite book|title=Book of Mormon, Ether 3:15-16|url=https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/bofm/ether/3.15-16?lang=eng|volume=Ether 3:15-16|date=26 March 1830}}</ref> In 1833, early in the [[Latter Day Saint movement]], its founder [[Joseph Smith]] taught that human souls are co-eternal with [[God in Mormonism|God the Father]] just as [[Jesus]] is co-eternal with God the Father, "Man was also in the beginning with God. Intelligence, or the light of truth, was not created or made, neither indeed can be."<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Ward |first=Ryan D. |date=2022-07-01 |title=A Reflection on Joseph Smith's Restorationist Vision of Truth |url=https://www.dialoguejournal.com/articles/a-reflection-on-joseph-smiths-restorationist-vision-of-truth/ |journal=[[Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought|Dialogue]] |volume=55 |issue=2 |page=94 |doi=10.5406/15549399.55.2.05 |issn=0012-2157}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Doctrine and Covenants|url=https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/dc-testament/dc/93.29?lang=eng|volume=93:29|date=6 May 1833}}</ref> After Smith's death, the doctrine of premortal life was elaborated by some other leaders within the [[Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints]] (LDS Church).{{cn|date=January 2025}} Although the mind and intelligence of humanity were still considered to be co-eternal with God, and not created, [[Brigham Young]] taught that the spirit was different from the mind or intelligence, resolving the seeming conflict between [[Book of Mormon]] verses indicating God was creator and Smith's later teaching that all individuals were co-eternal with God.{{cn|date=January 2025}} Young postulated that we each had a pre-spirit intelligence that later became part of a spirit body, which then eventually entered a physical body and was born on earth.{{cn|date=January 2025}} The LDS Church teaches that during the premortal life, there was a learning process which eventually led to the next necessary step in the premortal spirits' opportunity to progress. This next step included the need to gain a physical [[Human body|body]] that could experience [[pain]], sorrow and joy and "walk by faith".{{cn|date=January 2025}} According to this belief, these purposes were explained and discussed in [[Divine Council#Hebrew|councils in heaven]], followed by the [[War in Heaven]] where Satan rebelled against the plan of Heavenly Father.{{cn|date=January 2025}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)