Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Radiation hormesis
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Cultures === Studies in cell cultures can be useful for finding mechanisms for biological processes, but they also can be criticized for not effectively capturing the whole of the living organism. A study by E. I. Azzam suggested that pre-exposure to radiation causes cells to turn on protection mechanisms.<ref>{{cite journal| author=Azzam, E. I. |journal=Radiation Research |year=1994 |volume=138 |pmid=8146320 |pages=S28βS31 |doi=10.2307/3578755 |title=Radiation-Induced Adaptive Response for Protection against Micronucleus Formation and Neoplastic Transformation in C3H 10T1/2 Mouse Embryo Cells |last2=Raaphorst |first2=G. P. |last3=Mitchel |first3=R. E. J. |issue=1 |jstor=3578755 |bibcode=1994RadR..138S..28A}}</ref> A different study by de Toledo and collaborators has shown that irradiation with gamma rays increases the concentration of glutathione, an antioxidant found in cells.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1667/RR0640.1 |title=Adaptive Responses to Low-Dose/Low-Dose-Rate Ξ³ Rays in Normal Human Fibroblasts: The Role of Growth Architecture and Oxidative Metabolism |year=2006 |last1=De Toledo |first1=Sonia M. |last2=Asaad |first2=Nesrin |last3=Venkatachalam |first3=Perumal |last4=Li |first4=Ling |last5=Howell |first5=Roger W. |last6=Spitz |first6=Douglas R. |last7=Azzam |first7=Edouard I. |journal=Radiation Research |volume=166 |issue=6 |pages=849β857 |pmid=17149977|bibcode=2006RadR..166..849D |s2cid=31148344 }}</ref> In 2011, an ''in vitro'' study led by S. V. Costes showed in time-lapse images a strongly non-linear response of certain cellular repair mechanisms called radiation-induced foci (RIF). The study found that low doses of radiation prompted higher rates of RIF formation than high doses, and that after low-dose exposure RIF continued to form after the radiation had ended. Measured rates of RIF formation were 15 RIF/[[Gray (unit)|Gy]] at 2 Gy, and 64 RIF/Gy at 0.1 Gy.<ref name="Neumaier2011" /> These results suggest that low dose levels of [[ionizing radiation]] may not increase cancer risk directly proportional to dose and thus contradict the linear-no-threshold standard model.<ref name=HC24865 >{{Cite web |url=http://www.healthcanal.com/public-health-safety/24865-New-Take-Impacts-Low-Dose-Radiation.html |title = New Take on Impacts of Low Dose Radiation |date = 20 December 2011}}</ref> [[Mina Bissell]], a world-renowned breast-cancer researcher and collaborator in this study stated: "Our data show that at lower doses of ionizing radiation, DNA repair mechanisms work much better than at higher doses. This non-linear DNA damage response casts doubt on the general assumption that any amount of ionizing radiation is harmful and additive."<ref name=HC24865/>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)