Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Rank–nullity theorem
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===First proof=== Let <math>V, W</math> be vector spaces over some field <math>F,</math> and <math>T</math> defined as in the statement of the theorem with <math>\dim V = n</math>. As <math>\operatorname{Ker}T \subset V</math> is a [[Linear subspace|subspace]], there exists a basis for it. Suppose <math>\dim\operatorname{Ker}T = k</math> and let <math display="block">\mathcal{K} := \{v_1, \ldots, v_k\} \subset \operatorname{Ker}(T)</math> be such a basis. We may now, by the [[Steinitz exchange lemma]], extend <math>\mathcal{K}</math> with <math>n-k</math> linearly independent vectors <math>w_1, \ldots, w_{n-k}</math> to form a full basis of <math>V</math>. Let <math display="block"> \mathcal{S} := \{w_1, \ldots, w_{n-k}\} \subset V \setminus \operatorname{Ker}(T) </math> such that <math display="block"> \mathcal{B} := \mathcal{K} \cup \mathcal{S} = \{v_1, \ldots, v_k, w_1, \ldots, w_{n-k}\} \subset V </math> is a basis for <math>V</math>. From this, we know that <math display="block">\operatorname{Im} T = \operatorname{Span}T(\mathcal{B}) = \operatorname{Span}\{T(v_1), \ldots, T(v_k), T(w_1), \ldots, T(w_{n-k})\}</math> ::<math> = \operatorname{Span}\{T(w_1), \ldots, T(w_{n-k})\} = \operatorname{Span}T(\mathcal{S}) .</math> We now claim that <math>T(\mathcal{S})</math> is a basis for <math>\operatorname{Im} T</math>. The above equality already states that <math>T(\mathcal{S})</math> is a generating set for <math>\operatorname{Im} T</math>; it remains to be shown that it is also linearly independent to conclude that it is a basis. Suppose <math>T(\mathcal{S})</math> is not linearly independent, and let <math display="block"> \sum_{j=1}^{n-k} \alpha _j T(w_j) = 0_W </math> for some <math>\alpha _j \in F</math>. Thus, owing to the linearity of <math>T</math>, it follows that <math display="block"> T \left(\sum_{j=1}^{n-k} \alpha _j w_j \right) = 0_W \implies \left(\sum_{j=1}^{n-k} \alpha _j w_j \right) \in \operatorname{Ker} T = \operatorname{Span} \mathcal{K} \subset V .</math> This is a contradiction to <math>\mathcal{B}</math> being a basis, unless all <math>\alpha _j</math> are equal to zero. This shows that <math>T(\mathcal{S})</math> is linearly independent, and more specifically that it is a basis for <math>\operatorname{Im}T</math>. To summarize, we have <math>\mathcal{K}</math>, a basis for <math>\operatorname{Ker}T</math>, and <math>T(\mathcal{S})</math>, a basis for <math>\operatorname{Im}T</math>. Finally we may state that <math display="block"> \operatorname{Rank}(T) + \operatorname{Nullity}(T) = \dim \operatorname{Im} T + \dim \operatorname{Ker}T</math> ::<math> = |T(\mathcal{S})| + |\mathcal{K}| = (n-k) + k = n = \dim V .</math> This concludes our proof.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)