Editing Ray Noorda (section)

==References==
{{reflist|refs=
<ref name="FamousMormons">{{cite web |title=Famous Mormons in Business |url=http://www.famousmormons.net/bus03.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080514153045/http://www.famousmormons.net/bus03.html |archive-date=2008-05-14}}</ref>
<ref name="DeseretNews-1">{{cite journal |url=https://www.deseret.com/2006/10/13/19753596/obituary-raymond-john-noorda-1st-part/ |title=Obituary: Raymond John Nooorda (1st part) |journal=[[Deseret News]] |date=2006-10-13}}</ref>
<ref name="DeseretNews-2">{{cite journal |url=https://www.deseret.comhttps://www.deseret.com/2006/10/13/19753361/obituary-raymond-john-noorda-2nd-part/ |title=Obituary: Raymond John Noorda (2nd part) |journal=[[Deseret News]] |date=2006-10-13}}</ref>
<ref name="Lewyn_1993">{{cite journal |author-last1=Lewyn |author-first1=Mark |author-first2=Richard |author-last2=Brandt |date=1993-09-27 |title=Novell vs. Microsoft: What's Behind the Hate |journal=[[BusinessWeek]]}}</ref>
<ref name="Rohm_1998">{{cite book |author-first=Wendy |author-last=Goldman Rohm |date=1998-09-01 |title=The Microsoft File - The Secret Case Against Bill Gates |edition=1 |publisher=[[IDG]] |isbn=88-11-73868-7}}</ref>
<ref name="Fisher_1992">{{cite journal |author-last=Fisher |author-first=Lawrence M. |title=Preaching Love Thy Competitor |journal=[[New York Times]] |date=1992-03-29 |url=https://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E0CE0D9143EF93AA15750C0A964958260 |access-date=2018-08-04 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180627203815/https://www.nytimes.com/1992/03/29/business/preaching-love-thy-competitor.html |archive-date=2018-06-27}}</ref>
<ref name="Fisher_1994">{{cite journal |author-last=Fisher |author-first=Lawrence M. |date=1994-04-06 |title=Longtime Hewlett Executive Named Novell Chief |journal=[[New York Times]]}}</ref>
<ref name="Williamson_2006">{{cite journal |title=Obituary - Ray Noorda - Pioneer of 'co-opetition' |author-first=Marcus |author-last=Williamson |author-link=Marcus Williamson |date=2006-10-09 |journal=[[The Independent (UK)]] |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/ray-noorda-422415.html |access-date=2018-08-04 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180804102549/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/ray-noorda-422415.html |archive-date=2018-08-04}}</ref>
<ref name="Groklaw_2005">{{cite web |url=http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20050222001026429 |title=Canopy's motion to remove Yarro as director and memo - as text |publisher=[[Groklaw]] |date=2005-02-27}}</ref>
<ref name="Gray">{{cite news |title=Obituary |url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/obituaries/article603903.ece |work=[[The Times]] |author-first=Sadie |author-last=Gray}}{{dead link|date=September 2024|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref>
<ref name="Suicide_2005">{{cite web |url=http://opensource.sys-con.com/node/48789 |title=Noorda's Daughter Committed Suicide |publisher=Open Source Magazine |date=2005-03-21 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190929123356/http://opensource.sys-con.com/node/48789 |archive-date= 2019-09-29 |url-status=dead}}</ref>
<ref name="Groklaw_2009_NovellWP">{{cite web |author-first=Pamela |author-last=Jones |author-link=Pamela Jones |title=Exhibits to Microsoft's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment in Novell WordPerfect Case |url=http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20091120165256836 |work=[[Groklaw]] |date=2009-11-23 |access-date=2011-10-22 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130821080038/http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20091120165256836 |archive-date=2013-08-21 |quote=[…] exhibits attached to [[Microsoft]]'s Memorandum of Law in support of Microsoft's cross motion for summary judgment in the [[Novell]] v. Microsoft [[antitrust]] litigation. We finally find out what Microsoft paid [[Caldera, Inc.|Caldera]] to settle the [[DR-DOS|DrDOS]] litigation back in 2000: $280 million. We even get to read the settlement agreement. It's attached as an exhibit. […] The settlement terms were sealed for all these years, but […] now that mystery is solved. […] We also find out what Caldera/[[Canopy Group|Canopy]] then paid [[Novell]] from that $280 million: $35.5 million at first, and then after Novell successfully sued Canopy in 2004, Caldera's successor-in-interest on this matter, an additional $17.7 million, according to page 16 of the Memorandum. Microsoft claims that Novell is not the real party in interest in this antitrust case, and so it can't sue Microsoft for the claims it has lodged against it, because, Microsoft says, Novell sold its antitrust claims to Caldera when it sold it DrDOS. So the exhibits are trying to demonstrate that Novell got paid in full, so to speak, via that earlier litigation. As a result, we get to read a number of documents from the Novell v. Canopy litigation. Novell responds it retained its antitrust claims in the applications market. […]}}</ref>
<ref name="Microsoft_2009_Memorandum">{{cite web |title=Microsoft's memorandum in opposition to Novell's renewed motion for summary judgement on Microsoft's affirmative defenses and in support of Microsoft's cross-motion for summary judgement |author-first1=Richard J. |author-last1=Wallis |author-first2=Steven J. |author-last2=Aeschbacher |author-first3=Mark M. |author-last3=Bettilyon |author-first4=G. Stewar |author-last4=Webb, Jr. |author-first5=David B. |author-last5=Tulchin |author-first6=Steven L. |author-last6=Holley |date=2009-11-13 |location=United States District Court, District of Maryland |type=Court document |id=Novell, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation, Civil Action No. JFM-05-1087 |page=16 |url=http://www.groklaw.net/pdf2/NovvMS-104-2.pdf |access-date=2018-08-03 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190524154518/http://www.groklaw.net/pdf2/NovvMS-104-2.pdf |archive-date=2019-05-24 |quote=[…] [[Microsoft]] paid $280 million to [[Caldera, Inc.|Caldera]] to settle the case, and $35.5 million of the settlement proceeds were provided by Caldera to [[Novell]] as a so-called "royalty." […] Dissatisfied with that amount, Novell filed suit in June 2000 against Caldera (succeeded by [[The Canopy Group]]), alleging that Novell was entitled to even more. […] Novell ultimately prevailed, adding $17.7 million to its share of the monies paid by Microsoft to Caldera, for a total of more than $53 million […]}}</ref>
<ref name="Caldera_Microsoft_2000_Settlement">{{cite web |title=Settlement agreement - Microsoft Corporation and Caldera, Inc. reach agreement to settle antitrust lawsuit |author-first1=Thomas W. |author-last1=Burt |author-first2=Bryan Wayne |author-last2=Sparks |author-link2=Bryan Wayne Sparks |date=2000-01-07 |id=Case 1:05-cv-01087-JFM, Document 104-8, Filed 2009-11-13; NOV00107061-NOV00107071; LT2288-LT2298; Lan12S311263739.1; Exhibit A |type=Faxed court document |url=http://www.groklaw.net/pdf2/NovvMS-104-8.pdf |access-date=2018-08-03 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170704220659/http://groklaw.net/pdf2/NovvMS-104-8.pdf |archive-date=2017-07-04 |quote=[…] [[Microsoft]] will pay to [[Caldera, Inc.|Caldera]], by wire transfer in accordance with written instructions provided by Caldera, the amount of two hundred eighty million dollars ($280,000,000), as full settlement of all claims or potential claims covered by this agreement […]}} (NB. This document of the ''[[Caldera v. Microsoft]]'' case was an exhibit in the ''Novell v. Microsoft'' and ''[[Comes v. Microsoft]]'' cases.)</ref>
<ref name="Gomes_2000_Settlement">{{cite news |title=Microsoft Will Pay $275 Million To Settle Lawsuit From Caldera |author-first=Lee |author-last=Gomes |date=2000-01-11 |newspaper=[[The Wall Street Journal]] |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB947543007415899052 |access-date=2019-11-24 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161231130504/http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB947543007415899052 |archive-date=2016-12-31 |quote=[[Microsoft Corp.]] agreed to pay an estimated $275 million to settle an antitrust lawsuit by [[Caldera Inc.]], heading off a trial that was likely to air nasty allegations from a decade ago. […] Microsoft and Caldera, a small Salt Lake City software company that brought the suit in 1996, didn't disclose terms of the settlement. Microsoft, though, said it would take a charge of three cents a share for the agreement in the fiscal third quarter ending March 31 […] the company has roughly 5.5 billion shares outstanding […]}}</ref>
<ref name="Rogers_2019">{{cite web |title=Mark Rogers |work=QuantmRE |publisher=Quantm.One, Inc. |date=2019 |url=https://launch.quantmre.com/mark-rogers/ |access-date=2020-10-18 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201018101940/https://launch.quantmre.com/mark-rogers/ |archive-date=2020-10-18 |quote=Mark co-founded NFT Ventures with Ray Noorda, chairman of [[Novell, Inc.]] and for more than 12 years, managed the portfolio of assets for NFT valued at over $1 billion. He led investment activities in many successful startups primarily focused on technology software and services in Silicon Valley, Utah, Texas and Rhode Island and guided some of the companies through their developmental stages to an acquisition, merger or IPO. On behalf of NFT Ventures, Mark served as interim CEO for several portfolio companies.}}</ref>
<ref name="NFT_Ventures">{{cite web |title=Official Summary of Security Transactions and Holdings - for the period June 11, 1998 thru July 10, 1998 - Reported to the Securities and Exchange Commission Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 |volume=64 |issue=6–7 |publisher=[[U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission]] |date=1998-12-11 |page=329 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=BzE4AQAAMAAJ&q=NFT+Ventures+Noorda&pg=PA329 |access-date=2020-10-18 }}</ref>
}}