Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
RoHS
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Life-cycle impact assessment of lead-free solder === The [[United States Environmental Protection Agency]] (EPA) has published a [[life-cycle assessment]] (LCA) of the environmental impacts of lead-free and tin–lead [[solder]], as used in electronic products.<ref name="EPALifecycle">[http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/dfe/pubs/solder/lca/index.htm] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140314205628/http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/dfe/pubs/solder/lca/index.htm|date=14 March 2014}}</ref> For bar solders, when only lead-free solders were considered, the tin/copper alternative had the lowest (best) scores. For paste solders, [[bismuth]]/[[tin]]/silver had the lowest impact scores among the lead-free alternatives in every category except [[non-renewable resource]] consumption. For both paste and bar solders, all of the lead-free solder alternatives had a lower (better) LCA score in toxicity categories than tin/lead solder. This is primarily due to the toxicity of lead, and the amount of lead that leaches from printed wiring board assemblies, as determined by the leachability study conducted by the partnership. The study results are providing the industry with an objective analysis of the life-cycle environmental effects of leading candidate alternative lead-free solders, allowing industry to consider environmental concerns along with the traditionally evaluated parameters of cost and performance. This assessment is also allowing industry to redirect efforts toward products and processes that reduce solders' environmental footprint, including energy consumption, releases of toxic chemicals, and potential risks to human health and the environment. Another life-cycle assessment by IKP, University of Stuttgart, shows similar results to those of the EPA study.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://leadfree.ipc.org/files/RoHS_15.pdf |title=IKP, Department of Life-Cycle Engineering |publisher=Leadfree.ipc.org |access-date=3 July 2015 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090225155540/http://leadfree.ipc.org/files/RoHS_15.pdf |archive-date=25 February 2009}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)