Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Robots.txt
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Archival sites=== Some web archiving projects ignore robots.txt. [[Archive Team]] uses the file to discover more links, such as [[sitemap]]s.<ref>{{cite web |title=ArchiveBot: Bad behavior |url=https://wiki.archiveteam.org/index.php/ArchiveBot#Bad_behavior |website=wiki.archiveteam.org |publisher=Archive Team |access-date=10 October 2022 |archive-date=10 October 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221010034711/https://wiki.archiveteam.org/index.php/ArchiveBot#Bad_behavior |url-status=live }}</ref> Co-founder [[Jason Scott]] said that "unchecked, and left alone, the robots.txt file ensures no mirroring or reference for items that may have general use and meaning beyond the website's context."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.archiveteam.org/index.php?title=Robots.txt|publisher=Archive Team|title=Robots.txt is a suicide note|author=Jason Scott|access-date=18 February 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170218044527/http://www.archiveteam.org/index.php?title=Robots.txt|archive-date=2017-02-18|url-status=live|author-link=Jason Scott}}</ref> In 2017, the [[Internet Archive]] announced that it would stop complying with robots.txt directives.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://blog.archive.org/2017/04/17/robots-txt-meant-for-search-engines-dont-work-well-for-web-archives/|title=Robots.txt meant for search engines don't work well for web archives {{!}} Internet Archive Blogs|website=blog.archive.org|date=17 April 2017|language=en-US|access-date=2018-12-01|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181204130028/http://blog.archive.org/2017/04/17/robots-txt-meant-for-search-engines-dont-work-well-for-web-archives/|archive-date=2018-12-04|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Verge"/> According to ''[[Digital Trends]]'', this followed widespread use of robots.txt to remove historical sites from search engine results, and contrasted with the nonprofit's aim to archive "snapshots" of the internet as it previously existed.<ref name="Internet Archive">{{cite news |url=https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/internet-archive-robots-txt/#ixzz4gQYOqpUi |title=The Internet Archive Will Ignore Robots.txt Files to Maintain Accuracy |newspaper=[[Digital Trends]] |first=Brad |last=Jones |date=24 April 2017 |access-date=8 May 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170516130029/https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/internet-archive-robots-txt/#ixzz4gQYOqpUi |archive-date=2017-05-16 |url-status=live }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)