Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Serial-position effect
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Ratio rule=== Overall, an important [[Empirical research|empirical]] observation regarding the recency effect is that it is not the absolute duration of retention intervals (RI, the time between end of study and test period) or of inter-presentation intervals (IPI, the time between different study items) that matters. Rather, the amount of recency is determined by the [[Rational choice theory|ratio]] of RI to IPI (the ratio rule). As a result, as long as this ratio is fixed, recency will be observed regardless of the absolute values of intervals, so that recency can be observed at all time scales, a phenomenon known as''' time-scale invariance'''. This contradicts dual-store models, which assume that recency depends on the size of STS, and the rule governing the displacement of items in the STS.{{citation needed|date=October 2017}} Potential explanations either then explain the recency effect as occurring through a single, same mechanism, or re-explain it through a different type of model that postulates two different mechanisms for immediate and long-term recency effects. One such explanation is provided by Davelaar et al. (2005),<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Davelaar | first1 = E. K. | last2 = Goshen-Gottstein | first2 = Y. | last3 = Ashkenazi | first3 = A. | last4 = Haarmann | first4 = H. J. | last5 = Usher | first5 = M. | year = 2005 | title = The demise of short-term memory revisited: Empirical and computational investigations of recency effects | journal = Psychological Review | volume = 112 | issue = 1| pages = 3–42 | doi=10.1037/0033-295x.112.1.3 | pmid=15631586| s2cid = 16327806 }}</ref> who argue that there are [[Dissociation (psychology)|dissociations]] between immediate and long-term recency phenomena that cannot be explained by a single-component memory model, and who argues for the existence of a STS that explains immediate recency, and a second mechanism based on contextual drift that explains long-term recency. The recency effect as well as the '''ratio''' changes in [[Alzheimer's disease]] and therefore can be used as an indicator of this disease condition from the earliest stages of neurodegeneration <ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Kovács KA | title = Relevance of a Novel Circuit-Level Model of Episodic Memories to Alzheimer's Disease | journal = International Journal of Molecular Sciences | volume = 23 | issue = 1 | pages = 462 | date = December 2021 | doi = 10.3390/ijms23010462 | pmid = 35008886 | pmc = 8745479 | doi-access = free }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)