Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Set theory (music)
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Transpositional and inversional set classes== Two transpositionally related sets are said to belong to the same transpositional set class (T<sub>{{var|n}}</sub>). Two sets related by transposition or inversion are said to belong to the same transpositional/inversional set class (inversion being written T<sub>{{var|n}}</sub>I or I<sub>{{var|n}}</sub>). Sets belonging to the same transpositional set class are very similar-sounding; while sets belonging to the same transpositional/inversional set class could include two chords of the same type but in different keys, which would be less similar in sound but obviously still a bounded category. Because of this, music theorists often consider set classes basic objects of musical interest. There are two main conventions for naming equal-tempered set classes. One, known as the [[Forte number]], derives from Allen Forte, whose ''The Structure of Atonal Music'' (1973), is one of the first works in musical set theory. Forte provided each set class with a number of the form {{var|c}}β{{var|d}}, where {{var|c}} indicates the cardinality of the set and {{var|d}} is the ordinal number.{{sfn|Forte|1973|loc=12}} Thus the chromatic trichord {0, 1, 2} belongs to set-class 3β1, indicating that it is the first three-note set class in Forte's list.{{sfn|Forte|1973|loc=179β181}} The augmented trichord {0, 4, 8}, receives the label 3β12, which happens to be the last trichord in Forte's list. The primary criticisms of Forte's nomenclature are: (1) Forte's labels are arbitrary and difficult to memorize, and it is in practice often easier simply to list an element of the set class; (2) Forte's system assumes equal temperament and cannot easily be extended to include diatonic sets, pitch sets (as opposed to pitch-class sets), [[multisets]] or sets in other tuning systems; (3) Forte's original system considers inversionally related sets to belong to the same set-class. This means that, for example a major triad and a minor triad are considered the same set. Western tonal music for centuries has regarded major and minor, as well as chord inversions, as significantly different. They generate indeed completely different physical objects. Ignoring the physical reality of sound is an obvious limitation of atonal theory. However, the defense has been made that theory was not created to fill a vacuum in which existing theories inadequately explained tonal music. Rather, Forte's theory is used to explain atonal music, where the composer has invented a system where the distinction between {0, 4, 7} (called 'major' in tonal theory) and its inversion {0, 3, 7} (called 'minor' in tonal theory) may not be relevant. The second notational system labels sets in terms of their [[Set (music)#Non-serial|normal form]], which depends on the concept of ''normal order''. To put a set in ''normal order,'' order it as an ascending scale in pitch-class space that spans less than an octave. Then permute it cyclically until its first and last notes are as close together as possible. In the case of ties, minimize the distance between the first and next-to-last note. (In case of ties here, minimize the distance between the first and next-to-next-to-last note, and so on.) Thus {0, 7, 4} in normal order is {0, 4, 7}, while {0, 2, 10} in normal order is {10, 0, 2}. To put a set in normal form, begin by putting it in normal order, and then transpose it so that its first pitch class is 0.{{sfn|Rahn|1980|loc=33β38}} Mathematicians and computer scientists most often order combinations using either alphabetical ordering, binary (base two) ordering, or [[Gray coding]], each of which lead to differing but logical normal forms.{{Citation needed|date=September 2010}} Since transpositionally related sets share the same normal form, normal forms can be used to label the T<sub>{{var|n}}</sub> set classes. To identify a set's T<sub>{{var|n}}</sub>/I<sub>{{var|n}}</sub> set class: * Identify the set's T<sub>{{var|n}}</sub> set class. * Invert the set and find the inversion's T<sub>{{var|n}}</sub> set class. * Compare these two normal forms to see which is most "left packed." The resulting set labels the initial set's T<sub>{{var|n}}</sub>/I<sub>{{var|n}}</sub> set class.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)