Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Simulated annealing
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===The annealing schedule=== {{multiple image | align = right | total_width = 400 | image_gap = 1 | image1 = SimulatedAnnealingFast.jpg | alt1 = Fast | caption1 = Fast | image2 = SimulatedAnnealingSlow.jpg | alt2 = Slow | caption2 = Slow | footer= Example illustrating the effect of cooling schedule on the performance of simulated annealing. The problem is to rearrange the [[pixel]]s of an image so as to minimize a certain [[potential energy]] function, which causes similar [[color]]s to attract at short range and repel at a slightly larger distance. The elementary moves swap two adjacent pixels. These images were obtained with a fast cooling schedule (left) and a slow cooling schedule (right), producing results similar to [[amorphous]] and [[crystalline solid]]s, respectively. }} The name and inspiration of the algorithm demand an interesting feature related to the temperature variation to be embedded in the operational characteristics of the algorithm. This necessitates a gradual reduction of the temperature as the simulation proceeds. The algorithm starts initially with <math>T</math> set to a high value (or infinity), and then it is decreased at each step following some ''annealing schedule''βwhich may be specified by the user but must end with <math>T=0</math> towards the end of the allotted time budget. In this way, the system is expected to wander initially towards a broad region of the search space containing good solutions, ignoring small features of the energy function; then drift towards low-energy regions that become narrower and narrower, and finally move downhill according to the [[steepest descent]] heuristic. For any given finite problem, the probability that the simulated annealing algorithm terminates with a [[global optimum|global optimal]] solution approaches 1 as the annealing schedule is extended.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1109/34.295910 |title=Simulated annealing: A proof of convergence |year=1994 |last1=Granville |first1=V. |last2=Krivanek |first2=M. |last3=Rasson |first3=J.-P. |journal=IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence |volume=16 |issue=6 |pages=652β656}}</ref> This theoretical result, however, is not particularly helpful, since the time required to ensure a significant probability of success will usually exceed the time required for a [[Brute-force search|complete search]] of the [[solution space]].<ref>{{Citation |last1=Nolte |first1=Andreas |title=A Note on the Finite Time Behaviour of Simulated Annealing |date=1997 |url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-60744-8_32 |work=Operations Research Proceedings 1996 |volume=1996 |pages=175β180 |place=Berlin, Heidelberg |publisher=Springer Berlin Heidelberg |doi=10.1007/978-3-642-60744-8_32 |isbn=978-3-540-62630-5 |access-date=2023-02-06 |last2=Schrader |first2=Rainer|url-access=subscription }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)