Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Software patent debate
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Copyright limitations=== {{Main|Copyright infringement of software}} Patents protect functionality. Copyright on the other hand only protects expression. Substantial modification to an original work, even if it performs the same function, would not be prevented by copyright. To prove copyright infringement also requires the additional hurdle of proving copying, which is not necessary for patent infringement. Copyright law protects unique expressions, while patent law protects inventions, which in the case of software, are [[algorithm]]s; copyright cannot protect a novel means of accomplishing a function, merely the syntax of one such means.<ref>{{Cite news | url=https://www.law360.com/articles/5115/experts-debate-constitutionality-of-software-copyrights | title=Experts Debate Constitutionality Of Software Copyrights | access-date = 2017-03-28}}</ref> This means that patents incentivize projects that are unique and innovative in functionality rather than simply form. Copyrights, in turn, only incentivize uniqueness in form.<ref>{{Cite news | url=http://partnershipforamericaninnovation.org/software-myths-and-facts/#copyrightenough | title=Software Myths and Facts | access-date = 2017-03-29}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)