Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Specific performance
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Law and economics == In [[contract theory]], economists have compared specific performance to at-will contracts.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Fares |first=M'hand |date=2006 |title=Renegotiation Design and Contract Solutions to the Hold-Up Problem |url=https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2006.00266.x |journal=Journal of Economic Surveys |volume=20 |issue=5 |pages=731β756 |doi=10.1111/j.1467-6419.2006.00266.x |s2cid=155061589 |issn=0950-0804|url-access=subscription }}</ref> Suppose that a seller and a buyer have agreed to trade a good in the future. In the case of specific performance, delivery of the good can be mandated by the court, while in the case of at-will contracting, the seller always has the right to walk away from the contract. [[Oliver Hart (economist)|Hart]] and [[John Moore (economist)|Moore]] (1988) have shown that if only at-will contracts are enforceable, then the parties have insufficient incentives to make relationship-specific investments.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Hart |first1=Oliver |last2=Moore |first2=John |date=1988 |title=Incomplete Contracts and Renegotiation |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1912698 |journal=Econometrica |volume=56 |issue=4 |pages=755β785 |doi=10.2307/1912698 |jstor=1912698 |hdl=1721.1/63746 |issn=0012-9682|hdl-access=free }}</ref> Subsequently, several authors such as [[Philippe Aghion|Aghion]] et al. (1994) have shown that the underinvestment problem (sometimes called the [[hold-up problem]]) can be solved if specific performance contracts are feasible.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Aghion |first1=Philippe |last2=Dewatripont |first2=Mathias |last3=Rey |first3=Patrick |date=1994 |title=Renegotiation Design with Unverifiable Information |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2951613 |journal=Econometrica |volume=62 |issue=2 |pages=257β282 |doi=10.2307/2951613 |jstor=2951613 |issn=0012-9682}}</ref> However, these conclusions rely on the assumption that there are no [[Information asymmetry|information asymmetries]]. Schmitz (2022) has pointed out that if the seller may gain an informational advantage over the buyer after the contract has been signed, then at-will contracts may sometimes be preferable from an economic efficiency point-of-view.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Schmitz |first=Patrick W. |date=2022 |title=How (Not) to Purchase Novel Goods and Services: Specific Performance versus At-Will Contracts |journal=Economic Journal |volume=132|issue=647 |pages=2563β2577 |doi=10.1093/ej/ueac024 |doi-access=free }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)