Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Spoiler effect
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Runoff systems === Plurality-runoff methods like the [[two-round system]] and [[instant-runoff voting|RCV]] still experience vote-splitting in each round. This produces a kind of spoiler effect called a [[center squeeze]]. Compared to plurality without primaries, the elimination of weak candidates in earlier rounds reduces their effect on the final results; however, spoiled elections remain common compared to other systems.<ref name="Sen-2017" /><ref name="Borgers2">{{Cite book |last=Borgers |first=Christoph |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=u_XMHD4shnQC |title=Mathematics of Social Choice: Voting, Compensation, and Division |date=2010-01-01 |publisher=SIAM |isbn=9780898716955 |language=en |quote=Candidates C and D spoiled the election for B ... With them in the running, A won, whereas without them in the running, B would have won. ... Instant runoff voting ... does ''not'' do away with the spoiler problem entirely, although it ... makes it less likely}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Poundstone |first=William |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_24bJHyBV6sC |title=Gaming the Vote: Why Elections Aren't Fair (and What We Can Do About It) |date=2009-02-17 |publisher=Farrar, Straus and Giroux |isbn=9781429957649 |language=en |quote=IRV is excellent for preventing classic spoilers-minor candidates who tip the election from one major candidate to another. It is not so good when the 'spoiler' has a real chance of winning}}</ref> As a result, instant-runoff voting still tends towards [[Two-party system|two-party rule]] through the process known as [[Duverger's law]].<ref name="Poundstone, William.-201323"/><ref name=":35">{{Cite web |last=Drutman |first=Lee |date=2024-09-12 |title=We need more (and better) parties |url=https://leedrutman.substack.com/p/we-need-more-and-better-parties |access-date=2024-09-19 |website=Undercurrent Events}}</ref> A notable example of this can be seen in [[2024 United States House of Representatives election in Alaska|Alaska's 2024 race]], where party elites pressured candidate [[Nancy Dahlstrom]] into dropping out to avoid a repeat of the [[2022 Alaska's at-large congressional district special election|spoiled 2022 election]].<ref name=":14">{{Cite book |last=VoliΔ |first=Ismar |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/jj.7492228 |title=Making Democracy Count |date=2024-04-02 |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=978-0-691-24882-0 |publication-date=2024-04-02 |at=Ch. 2 |chapter=Duverger's law |doi=10.2307/jj.7492228}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Strassel |first=Kimberly A. |date=2024-08-27 |title=Ranked Choice May Die in Alaska |url=https://www.wsj.com/opinion/ranked-choice-may-die-in-alaska-4452235c |work=[[The Wall Street Journal]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Early |first=Wesley |date=2024-09-05 |title=Why candidates are withdrawing from Alaska's general election |url=https://alaskapublic.org/2024/09/04/why-candidates-are-withdrawing-from-alaskas-general-election/ |access-date=2024-09-20 |website=Alaska Public Media |publisher=[[NPR]] |place=[[Anchorage]], [[Alaska]] |language=en-US}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)