Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Total derivative
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Example: Differentiation with indirect dependencies=== While one can often perform substitutions to eliminate indirect dependencies, the [[chain rule]] provides for a more efficient and general technique. Suppose <math>L(t,x_1,\dots,x_n)</math> is a function of time <math>t</math> and <math>n</math> variables <math>x_i</math> which themselves depend on time. Then, the time derivative of <math>L</math> is :<math>\frac{dL}{dt} = \frac{d}{dt} L \bigl(t, x_1(t), \ldots, x_n(t)\bigr).</math> The chain rule expresses this derivative in terms of the partial derivatives of <math>L</math> and the time derivatives of the functions <math>x_i</math>: :<math>\frac{dL}{dt} = \frac{\partial L}{\partial t} + \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{\partial L}{\partial x_i}\frac{dx_i}{dt} = \biggl(\frac{\partial}{\partial t} + \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{dx_i}{dt}\frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}\biggr)(L).</math> This expression is often used in [[physics]] for a [[gauge transformation]] of the [[Lagrangian mechanics|Lagrangian]], as two Lagrangians that differ only by the total time derivative of a function of time and the <math>n</math> [[generalized coordinates]] lead to the same equations of motion. An interesting example concerns the resolution of causality concerning the [[Wheeler–Feynman absorber theory#Resolution of causality issue|Wheeler–Feynman time-symmetric theory]]. The operator in brackets (in the final expression above) is also called the total derivative operator (with respect to <math>t</math>). For example, the total derivative of <math>f(x(t),y(t))</math> is :<math>\frac{df}{dt} = { \partial f \over \partial x}{dx \over dt} + {\partial f \over \partial y}{dy \over dt }.</math> Here there is no <math>\partial f / \partial t</math> term since <math>f</math> itself does not depend on the independent variable <math>t</math> directly.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)