Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Vole
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Mating system== Voles may be either monogamous or polygamous, which leads to differing patterns of [[mate choice]] and parental care. Environmental conditions play a large part in dictating which system is active in a given population. Voles live in colonies due to the young remaining in the family group for relatively long periods.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Potapov |first1=M. |last2=Zadubrovskaya |first2=I. |last3=Zabudrovskii |first3=P. |last4=Potapova |first4=O. |last5=Eviskov |first5=V. |year=2011 |title=Mating Systems in the Steppe Lemming (''Lagurus lagurus'') and Narrow-Skulled Vole (''Microtus gregalis'') from the Northern Kulunda Steppe |journal=Russian Journal of Ecology |volume=43 |issue=1 |pages=40β44 |doi=10.1134/S1067413612010109 |s2cid=16261654 }}</ref> In the genus ''[[Microtus]]'', monogamy is preferred when resources are spatially homogeneous and population densities are low; where the opposites of both conditions are realized, polygamous tendencies arise.<ref name="St">{{cite journal |last1=Streatfeild |first1=C. |last2=Mabry |first2=K. |last3=Keane |first3=B. |last4=Crist |first4=T. |last5=Solomon |first5=N. |year=2011 |title=Intraspecific Variability in the Social and Genetic Mating System of Prairie Voles, ''Microtus ochrogaster'' |journal=Animal Behaviour |volume=82 |issue=6 |pages=1387β1398 |doi=10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.09.023 |s2cid=53257008 }}</ref> Vole [[mating system]]s are also sensitive to the [[operational sex ratio]] and tend toward monogamy when males and females are present in equal numbers. Where one sex is more numerous than the other, [[animal sexual behaviour#Polygamy|polygamy]] is more likely.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Zhang |first1=J. |last2=Zhang |first2=Z. |year=2003 |title=Influence of Operational Sex Ratio and Density on the Copulatory Behaviour and Mating System of Brandt's Vole ''Microtus brandt'' |journal=Acta Theriologica |volume=48 |issue=3 |pages=335β346 |doi=10.1007/BF03194173 |s2cid=42697613 }}</ref> However the most marked effect on mating system is population density and these effects can take place both inter and intra-specifically.<ref name="St" /> Male voles are territorial and tend to include territories of several female voles when possible. Under these conditions polygyny exists and males offer little parental care.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Ostfeld |first=R. |year=1986 |title=Territoriality and Mating System of California Voles |journal=Journal of Animal Ecology |volume=55 |issue=2 |pages=691β706 |doi=10.2307/4748 |jstor=4748 |bibcode=1986JAnEc..55..691O }}</ref> Males mark and aggressively defend their territories since females prefer males with the most recent marking in a given area.<ref name="Park">{{cite journal |last1=Parker |first1=K. |last2=Phillips |first2=K. |last3=Lee |first3=T. |year=2001 |title=Development of Selective Partner Preferences in Captive Male and Female Meadow Voles, ''Microtus pennsylvanicus'' |journal=Animal Behaviour |volume=61 |issue=6 |pages=1217β1226 |doi=10.1006/anbe.2000.1707 |s2cid=36508541 }}</ref> Voles prefer familiar mates through olfactory sensory exploitation. Monogamous voles prefer males who have yet to mate, while non-monogamous voles do not.<ref name="Salo">{{cite journal |last1=Salo |first1=A. |last2=Dewsbury |first2=D. |year=1995 |title=Three Experiments on Mate Choice in Meadow Voles (''Microtus pennsylvanicus'') |journal=Journal of Comparative Psychology |volume=109 |issue=1 |pages=42β46 |doi=10.1037/0735-7036.109.1.42 |pmid=7705059 }}</ref> Mate preference in voles develops through cohabitation in as little as 24 hours.<ref name="Park" /> This drives young male voles to show non-limiting preference toward female siblings. This is not inclusive to females' preference for males which may help to explain the absence of interbreeding indicators.{{clarify|date=May 2019}} Although females show little territoriality, under pair bonding conditions they tend to show aggression toward other female voles.<ref name="Salo" /> This behavior is flexible as some ''[[Microtus]]'' females share dens during the winter months, perhaps to conserve heat and energy.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Lambin |first1=X. |last2=Krebs |first2=C. |last3=Scott |first3=B. |year=1992 |title=Spacing Systems of the Tundra Vole (''Microtus oeconomus'') During the Breeding Season in Canada's Western Arctic |journal=Canadian Journal of Zoology |volume=70 |issue=10 |pages=2068β2072 |doi=10.1139/z92-278 }}</ref> Populations which are monogamous show relatively minor [[sexual dimorphism|size differences between genders]] compared with those using polygamous systems.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Lee |first1=C. |last2=Chui |first2=C. |last3=Lin |first3=L. |last4=Lin |first4=Y. |year=2014 |title=Partner Preference and Mating System of the Taiwan Field Vole (Microtus kikuchii) |journal=Taiwania |volume=59 |issue=2 |pages=127β138 |doi=10.6165/tai.2014.59.127 }}</ref> The grey-sided vole (''[[Myodes rufocanus]]'') exhibits male-biased dispersal as a means of avoiding incestuous matings.<ref name="pmid19140979">{{cite journal |vauthors=Ishibashi Y, Saitoh T |title=Role of male-biased dispersal in inbreeding avoidance in the grey-sided vole (Myodes rufocanus) |journal=Mol. Ecol. |volume=17 |issue=22 |pages=4887β96 |year=2008 |pmid=19140979 |doi=10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03969.x |bibcode=2008MolEc..17.4887I |s2cid=44992920 }}</ref> Among those matings that involve inbreeding, the number of weaned juveniles in litters is significantly fewer than that from noninbred litters, due to [[inbreeding depression]]. Brandt's vole (''[[Lasiopodomys brandtii]]'') lives in groups that mainly consist of close relatives. However, they show no sign of inbreeding.<ref name=Liu>{{cite journal |vauthors=Liu XH, Yue LF, Wang da W, Li N, Cong L |title=Inbreeding avoidance drives consistent variation of fine-scale genetic structure caused by dispersal in the seasonal mating system of Brandt's voles |journal=PLOS ONE |volume=8 |issue=3 |pages=e58101 |year=2013 |pmid=23516435 |pmc=3597616 |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0058101 |bibcode=2013PLoSO...858101L |doi-access=free }}</ref> The mating system of these voles involves a type of [[Polygyny in animals|polygyny]] for males and extra-group [[Polyandry in animals|polyandry]] for females. This system increases the frequency of mating among distantly related individuals, and is achieved mainly by dispersal during the [[mating season]].<ref name=Liu /> Such a strategy is likely an adaptation to avoid the inbreeding depression that would be caused by expression of deleterious recessive alleles if close relatives mated.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)