Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Democratization
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== War and peace ==== {{main|Territorial peace theory}} [[File:War Office Second World War Official Collection B11634.jpg|thumb|Two British Marine Commandos take protection behind debris during the capture of Walcheren Island during World War II. The link between war and democratization has been a focus of some theories.]] Wars may contribute to the [[state-building]] that precedes a transition to democracy, but war is mainly a serious obstacle to democratization. While adherents of the [[democratic peace theory]] believe that democracy causes peace, the [[territorial peace theory]] makes the opposite claim that peace causes democracy. In fact, war and territorial threats to a country are likely to increase [[authoritarianism]] and lead to autocracy. This is supported by historical evidence showing that in almost all cases, peace has come before democracy. A number of scholars have argued that there is little support for the hypothesis that democracy causes peace, but strong evidence for the opposite hypothesis that peace leads to democracy.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Gibler |first1=Douglas M. |last2=Owsiak |first2=Andrew |title=Democracy and the Settlement of International Borders, 1919β2001 |journal=Journal of Conflict Resolution |volume=62 |issue=9 |pages=1847β1875 |date=2017 |doi=10.1177/0022002717708599|s2cid=158036471 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Gat |first1=Azar |title=The Causes of War and the Spread of Peace: Will War Rebound? |date=2017 |publisher=Oxford University Press}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Ray |first1=James Lee |title=Does Democracy Cause Peace? |journal=[[Annual Review of Political Science]] |date=1998 |volume=1 |pages=27β46 |doi=10.1146/annurev.polisci.1.1.27}}</ref> [[Christian Welzel|Christian Welzel's]] [[Freedom Rising|human empowerment theory]] posits that existential security leads to emancipative cultural values and support for a democratic political organization.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Welzel |first1=Christian |title=Freedom Rising: Human Empowerment and the Quest for Emancipation |date=2013 |publisher=Cambridge University Press}}</ref> This is in agreement with theories based on [[evolutionary psychology]]. The so-called [[Theory of Regal and Kungic Societal Structures|regality theory]] finds that people develop a psychological preference for a strong leader and an [[Authoritarianism|authoritarian]] form of government in situations of war or perceived collective danger. On the other hand, people will support [[egalitarianism|egalitarian]] values and a preference for democracy in situations of peace and safety. The consequence of this is that a society will develop in the direction of [[autocracy]] and an authoritarian government when people perceive collective danger, while the development in the democratic direction requires collective safety.<ref name="Fog2017">{{cite book |last1=Fog |first1=Agner |date=2017 |title=Warlike and Peaceful Societies: The Interaction of Genes and Culture |publisher=Open Book Publishers |doi=10.11647/OBP.0128 |isbn=978-1-78374-403-9 |doi-access=free }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)