Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Psychoanalysis
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Critical perspectives=== {{Further|Anti-psychiatry|Deinstitutionalisation}} Contemporary philosophers [[Gilles Deleuze]] and [[Félix Guattari]] asserted that the institution of psychoanalysis has become a [[Power (social and political)|center of power]] and that its [[Confession|confessional techniques]] resemble [[Confession (religion)|those included and utilized]] within the [[Christianity|Christian religion]].<ref>[[Jeffrey Weeks (sociologist)|Weeks, Jeffrey]]. 1989. ''Sexuality and its Discontents: Meanings, Myths, and Modern Sexualities''. New York: Routledge. {{ISBN|978-0-415-04503-2}}. p. 176.</ref> Their most in-depth criticism of the power structure of psychoanalysis and its connivance with [[capitalism]] are found in ''[[Anti-Oedipus]]'' (1972)<ref>[[Gilles Deleuze|Deleuze, Gilles]], and [[Félix Guattari]]. 1984 [1972]. ''[[Anti-Oedipus|Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia]]''. London: Athlone. {{ISBN|978-0-485-30018-5}}.</ref> and ''[[A Thousand Plateaus]]'' (1980), the two volumes of their theoretical work ''[[Capitalism and Schizophrenia]]''.<ref name="Lecercle 2012">{{cite journal |last=Lecercle |first=Jean-Jacques |title=Machinations deleuzo-guattariennes |date=October 2012 |url=https://www.cairn-int.info/journal-actuel-marx-2012-2-page-108.htm?contenu=article |editor1-last=Ducange |editor1-first=Jean-Numa |editor2-last=Sibertin-Blanc |editor2-first=Guillaume |journal=Actuel Marx |publisher=P.U.F. |location=[[Paris]] |volume=52 |issue=2 |pages=108–120 |doi=10.3917/amx.052.0108 |eissn=1969-6728 |isbn=978-2-13-059331-7 |issn=0994-4524 |via=[[Cairn.info]]|doi-access=free |url-access=subscription }}</ref> In ''Anti-Oedipus'', Deleuze and Guattari take the cases of [[Gérard Mendel]], [[Bela Grunberger]], and [[Janine Chasseguet-Smirgel]], prominent members of the most respected psychoanalytical associations (including the [[International Psychoanalytical Association|IPA]]), to suggest that, traditionally, psychoanalysis had always enthusiastically enjoyed and embraced a [[police state]] throughout its history.<ref>[[Gilles Deleuze|Deleuze, Gilles]], and [[Félix Guattari]]. 1984 [1972]. "The Disjunctive Synthesis of Recording." Section 2.4 in [[Anti-Oedipus|''Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia'']]. London: Athlone. {{ISBN|978-0-485-30018-5}}. p. 89.</ref> French psychoanalyst [[Jacques Lacan]] criticized the emphasis of some American and British psychoanalytical traditions on what he viewed as the suggestion of imaginary "causes" for symptoms and recommended the return to Freud.<ref>[[Jacques Lacan|Lacan, Jacques]]. 1977. ''Ecrits: A Selection and The Seminars'', translated by [[Alan Sheridan]]. London: Tavistock.</ref> Belgian psycholinguist and psychoanalyst [[Luce Irigaray]] also criticized psychoanalysis, employing [[Jacques Derrida]]'s concept of [[phallogocentrism]] to describe the exclusion of women from both Freudian and Lacanian psychoanalytical theories.<ref>{{citation |author = Irigaray L |title = Speculum |location = Paris |publisher = Minuit |year = 1974 |isbn = 978-2-7073-0024-9 }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)