Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
International Criminal Court
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== U.S. criticisms ==== The [[United States Department of State]] argues that there are "insufficient checks and balances on the authority of the ICC prosecutor and judges" and "insufficient protection against politicized prosecutions or other abuses".<ref name="US DoS faq"/> The current law in the United States on the ICC is the ''[[American Service-Members' Protection Act]]'' (ASPA), 116 Stat. 820. The ASPA authorizes the President of the United States to use "all means necessary and appropriate to bring about the release of any U.S. or allied personnel being detained or imprisoned by, on behalf of, or at the request of the International Criminal Court". This authorization has led the act to be nicknamed the "Hague Invasion Act",<ref>{{cite web |author=Human Rights Watch |url=https://www.hrw.org/en/news/2002/08/03/us-hague-invasion-act-becomes-law |title=U.S.: 'Hague Invasion Act' Becomes Law |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150118203654/http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2002/08/03/us-hague-invasion-act-becomes-law |archive-date=18 January 2015 |date=3 August 2002}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/Archive/Article/0,4273,4456801,00.html |title=Who are America's real enemies? |newspaper=[[The Guardian]] |author=John Sutherland |date=8 July 2002 |access-date=8 January 2007}}</ref> because the freeing of U.S. citizens by force might be possible only through military action. On 10 September 2018, [[John R. Bolton]], in his first major address as U.S. [[National Security Advisor (United States)|National Security Advisor]], reiterated that the ICC lacks checks and balances, exercises "jurisdiction over crimes that have disputed and ambiguous definitions", and has failed to "deter and punish atrocity crimes". The ICC, Bolton said, was "superfluous", given that "domestic judicial systems already hold American citizens to the highest legal and ethical standards". He added that the U.S. would do everything "to protect our citizens" should the ICC attempt to prosecute U.S. servicemen over alleged [[Bagram torture and prisoner abuse|detainee abuse in Afghanistan]]. In that event, ICC judges and prosecutors would be barred from entering the U.S., their funds in the U.S. would be sanctioned and the U.S. "will prosecute them in the U.S. criminal system. We will do the same for any company or state that assists an ICC investigation of Americans", Bolton said. He also criticized [[Palestinian government|Palestinian]] efforts to bring Israel before the ICC over allegations of human rights abuses in the [[West Bank]] and Gaza.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-45474864 |title=International Criminal Court: US threatens sanctions |last=McKelvey |first=Tara |date=10 September 2018|publisher=[[BBC]] |access-date=10 September 2018 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20180910212031/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-45474864 |archive-date=10 September 2018|url-status=live}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)