Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Axiom schema of specification
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== In Quine's New Foundations == {{Unreferenced section|date=June 2024}} In the [[New Foundations]] approach to set theory pioneered by [[W. V. O. Quine]], the axiom of comprehension for a given predicate takes the unrestricted form, but the predicates that may be used in the schema are themselves restricted. The predicate ({{mvar|C}} is not in {{mvar|C}}) is forbidden, because the same symbol {{mvar|C}} appears on both sides of the membership symbol (and so at different "relative types"); thus, Russell's paradox is avoided. However, by taking {{math|{{var|P}}({{var|C}})}} to be {{math|1=({{var|C}} = {{var|C}})}}, which is allowed, we can form a set of all sets. For details, see [[stratification (mathematics)|stratification]].
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)