Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Boosting (machine learning)
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Boosting for multi-class categorization=== Compared with binary categorization, [[multi-class categorization]] looks for common features that can be shared across the categories at the same time. They turn to be more generic [[Edge detection|edge]] like features. During learning, the detectors for each category can be trained jointly. Compared with training separately, it [[Generalization|generalizes]] better, needs less training data, and requires fewer features to achieve the same performance. The main flow of the algorithm is similar to the binary case. What is different is that a measure of the joint training error shall be defined in advance. During each iteration the algorithm chooses a classifier of a single feature (features that can be shared by more categories shall be encouraged). This can be done via converting [[multi-class classification]] into a binary one (a set of categories versus the rest),<ref>A. Torralba, K. P. Murphy, et al., "Sharing visual features for multiclass and multiview object detection", IEEE Transactions on PAMI 2006</ref> or by introducing a penalty error from the categories that do not have the feature of the classifier.<ref>A. Opelt, et al., "Incremental learning of object detectors using a visual shape alphabet", CVPR 2006</ref> In the paper "Sharing visual features for multiclass and multiview object detection", A. Torralba et al. used [[GentleBoost]] for boosting and showed that when training data is limited, learning via sharing features does a much better job than no sharing, given same boosting rounds. Also, for a given performance level, the total number of features required (and therefore the run time cost of the classifier) for the feature sharing detectors, is observed to scale approximately [[logarithm]]ically with the number of class, i.e., slower than [[linear]] growth in the non-sharing case. Similar results are shown in the paper "Incremental learning of object detectors using a visual shape alphabet", yet the authors used [[AdaBoost]] for boosting.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)