Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Classical XY model
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Phase transition == As mentioned above in one dimension the XY model does not have a phase transition, while in two dimensions it has the [[Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition|Berezinski-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition]] between the phases with exponentially and powerlaw decaying correlation functions. In three and higher dimensions the XY model has a ferromagnet-paramagnet phase transition. At low temperatures the spontaneous magnetization is nonzero: this is the ferromagnetic phase. As the temperature is increased, spontaneous magnetization gradually decreases and vanishes at a critical temperature. It remains zero at all higher temperatures: this is the paramagnetic phase. In four and higher dimensions the phase transition has mean field theory critical exponents (with logarithmic corrections in four dimensions). === Three dimensional case: the critical exponents === The three dimensional case is interesting because the critical exponents at the phase transition are nontrivial. Many three-dimensional physical systems belong to the same [[universality class]] as the three dimensional XY model and share the same critical exponents, most notably easy-plane magnets and liquid [[Lambda point|Helium-4]]. The values of these [[critical exponent]]s are measured by experiments, Monte Carlo simulations, and can also be computed by theoretical methods of quantum field theory, such as the [[renormalization group]] and the [[conformal bootstrap]]. Renormalization group methods are applicable because the critical point of the XY model is believed to be described by a renormalization group fixed point. Conformal bootstrap methods are applicable because it is also believed to be a unitary three dimensional [[conformal field theory]]. Most important [[critical exponent]]s of the three dimensional XY model are <math>\alpha,\beta,\gamma,\delta,\nu,\eta</math>. All of them can be expressed via just two numbers: the scaling dimensions <math>\Delta_\phi</math> and <math>\Delta_s</math> of the complex order parameter field <math>\phi</math> and of the leading singlet operator <math>s</math> (same as<math>|\phi|^2</math> in the [[Ginzburg–Landau theory|Ginzburg–Landau]] description). Another important field is <math>s'</math>(same as <math>|\phi|^4</math>), whose dimension <math>\Delta_{s'}</math> determines the correction-to-scaling exponent <math>\omega</math>. According to a conformal bootstrap computation,<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Chester|first1=Shai M.|last2=Landry|first2=Walter|last3=Liu|first3=Junyu|last4=Poland|first4=David|last5=Simmons-Duffin|first5=David|last6=Su|first6=Ning|last7=Vichi|first7=Alessandro|title=Carving out OPE space and precise O(2) model critical exponents|url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/JHEP06(2020)142|journal=Journal of High Energy Physics|year=2020|language=en|volume=2020|issue=6|pages=142|arxiv=1912.03324|doi=10.1007/JHEP06(2020)142|bibcode=2020JHEP...06..142C|s2cid=208910721|issn=1029-8479}}</ref> these three dimensions are given by: {| class="wikitable" |- |<math>\Delta_{\phi}</math> |0.519088(22) |- |<math>\Delta_s</math> |1.51136(22) |- |<math>\Delta_{s'}</math> |3.794(8) |} This gives the following values of the critical exponents: {| class="wikitable" |- ! !general expression (<math>d=3</math>) ! numerical value |- |{{math|<var>α</var>}} |<math>2-d/(d-\Delta_s)</math> | -0.01526(30) |- |{{math|<var>β</var>}} |<math> \Delta_\phi/(d-\Delta_s)</math> | 0.34869(7) |- |{{math|<var>γ</var>}} |<math>(d-2\Delta_\phi)/(d-\Delta_s) </math> | 1.3179(2) |- |{{math|<var>δ</var>}} |<math> (d-\Delta_\phi)/\Delta_\phi</math> | 4.77937(25) |- |{{math|<var>η</var>}} |<math>2\Delta_\phi - d+2</math> | 0.038176(44) |- |{{math|<var>ν</var>}} |<math>1/(d-\Delta_s)</math> | 0.67175(10) |- |{{math|<var>ω</var>}} |<math>\Delta_{s'}-d</math> | 0.794(8) |} Monte Carlo methods give compatible determinations:<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Hasenbusch|first=Martin|date=2019-12-26|title=Monte Carlo study of an improved clock model in three dimensions|url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.224517|journal=Physical Review B|language=en|volume=100|issue=22|pages=224517|arxiv=1910.05916|doi=10.1103/PhysRevB.100.224517|bibcode=2019PhRvB.100v4517H|s2cid=204509042|issn=2469-9950}}</ref> <math>\eta=0.03810(8),\nu=0.67169(7), \omega=0.789(4)</math>.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)