Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Database right
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===United States=== Uncreative collections of facts are outside of Congressional authority under the [[Copyright Clause]] (Article I, Β§ 8, cl. 8) of the United States Constitution, therefore no database right exists in the United States. Originality is the ''[[sine qua non]]'' of copyright in the United States (''see [[Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service]]''). This has not stopped database owners lobbying for the introduction of such a right, but so far bills to introduce it in the US have been prevented by the successful lobbying of research libraries, consumer groups and firms who benefit from the free use of factual information.<ref name="merges-2000"> {{cite journal | last1 = Merges | first1 = Robert P | title = One hundred years of solicitude: intellectual property law, 1900β2000 | date = 2000 | journal = California Law Review | volume = 88 | issue = 6 | pages = 2187β2240 | doi = 10.2307/3481215 | jstor = 3481215 | url = http://lawcat.berkeley.edu/record/1117293 | url-access = subscription }} </ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)