Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Elementary class
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== An elementary, basic pseudoelementary class that is not basic elementary === Let Ο be an arbitrary signature. The class ''K'' of all infinite Ο-structures is elementary. To see this, consider the sentences :<math>\rho_2={}</math> "<math>\exist x_1\exist x_2(x_1 \not =x_2)</math>", :<math>\rho_3={}</math> "<math>\exist x_1\exist x_2\exist x_3((x_1 \not =x_2) \land (x_1 \not =x_3) \land (x_2 \not =x_3))</math>", and so on. (So the sentence <math>\rho_n</math> says that there are at least ''n'' elements.) The infinite Ο-structures are precisely the models of the theory :<math>T_\infty=\{\rho_2, \rho_3, \rho_4, \dots\}</math>. But ''K'' is not a basic elementary class. Otherwise the infinite Ο-structures would be precisely those that satisfy a certain first-order sentence Ο. But then the set <math>\{\neg\tau, \rho_2, \rho_3, \rho_4, \dots\}</math> would be inconsistent. By the [[compactness theorem]], for some natural number ''n'' the set <math>\{\neg\tau, \rho_2, \rho_3, \rho_4, \dots, \rho_n\}</math> would be inconsistent. But this is absurd, because this theory is satisfied by any finite Ο-structure with <math>n+1</math> or more elements. However, there is a basic elementary class ''K<nowiki>'</nowiki>'' in the signature Ο' = Ο <math>\cup</math> {''f''}, where ''f'' is a unary function symbol, such that ''K'' consists exactly of the reducts to Ο of Ο'-structures in ''K<nowiki>'</nowiki>''. ''K<nowiki>'</nowiki>'' is axiomatised by the single sentence <math>(\forall x\forall y(f(x) = f(y) \rightarrow x=y) \land \exists y\neg\exists x(y = f(x))),</math>, which expresses that ''f'' is injective but not surjective. Therefore, ''K'' is elementary and what could be called basic pseudo-elementary, but not basic elementary.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)