Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Failure to appear
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Criticism== === Definitional problems === Critics argue that policymakers define "failure to appear" too broadly, conflating people who intentionally flee the jurisdiction with those who miss their court dates due to forgetfulness or logistical difficulties.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Gouldin |first=Lauren P. |date=2018 |title=Defining Flight Risk |url=https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/sites/lawreview.uchicago.edu/files/02%20Gouldin_ART_SA%20%28JPM%29.pdf |journal=University of Chicago Law Review |volume=85 |pages=687}}</ref> Risk-assessment tools tend to treat all FTAs the same when calculating a defendant's risk score.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Gouldin |first=Lauryn P. |date=2018 |title=Defining Flight Risk |url=https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/sites/lawreview.uchicago.edu/files/02%20Gouldin_ART_SA%20%28JPM%29.pdf |journal=University of Chicago Law Review |volume=85 |pages=684}}</ref> One scholar has proposed breaking FTAs into three categories: "true flight" (intentionally fleeing the area); local absconding (remaining in the jurisdiction but refusing to come to court even if reminded); and low-cost non-appearance (failing to appear for reasons besides avoiding justice).<ref name=":2">{{Cite journal |last=Gouldin |first=Lauryn P. |date=2018 |title=Defining Flight Risk |url=https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/sites/lawreview.uchicago.edu/files/02%20Gouldin_ART_SA%20%28JPM%29.pdf |journal=University of Chicago Law Review |volume=85 |pages=683}}</ref> Critics say these types of FTAs may warrant different interventions.<ref name=":2" /> === Causes of non-appearance === Scholars, activists, and practitioners have criticized federal and state laws for operating on the mistaken assumption that most FTAs reflect a conscious decision to abscond.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal |last1=Fishbane |first1=Alissa |last2=Ouss |first2=Aurelie |last3=Shah |first3=Anuj K. |date=2020 |title=Behavioral Nudges Reduce Failure to Appear for Court |url=https://www.ideas42.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Behavioral-nudges-reduce-failure-to-appear-for-court_Science.full_.pdf |journal=Science |language=en |volume=370 |issue= 6517|pages=1 |doi= 10.1126/science.abb6591|pmid=33033154 |s2cid=222235406 |issn= |via=Ideas42}}</ref><ref name=":1" /> Critics believe most FTAs are the product of forgetfulness or logistical difficulties—and that, if given another opportunity, a defendant will appear when requested.<ref name=":1" /> They note that a single legal proceeding can span several years and consist of multiple court dates;<ref name=":1" /> due to backlogs in some courts, defendants may wait all day for their hearings only for a judge to impose a delay.<ref>{{Cite news |last= |first= |date=May 11, 2016 |title=A Nightmare Court, Worthy of Dickens |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/12/opinion/a-nightmare-court-worthy-of-dickens.html |access-date= |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> Defendants who must go before a judge regularly can confuse or forget their court dates.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Gouldin |first=Lauryn P. |date=2018 |title=Defining Flight Risk |url=https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/sites/lawreview.uchicago.edu/files/02%20Gouldin_ART_SA%20%28JPM%29.pdf |journal=University of Chicago Law Review |volume=85 |pages=730}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last1=Cook |first1=Brice |last2=Diop |first2=Binta Zahra |last3=Fishbane |first3=Alissa |last4=Hayes |first4=Jonathan |last5=Ouss |first5=Aurelie |last6=Shah |first6=Anuj |date=January 2018 |title=Using Behavioral Science to Improve Criminal Justice Outcomes: Preventing Failures to Appear in Court |url=https://www.ideas42.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Using-Behavioral-Science-to-Improve-Criminal-Justice-Outcomes.pdf |website=ideas42}}</ref> Jurisdictions nationwide have reduced FTA rates by reminding people of upcoming court hearings.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Baradaran Baughman |first=Shima |date=2020 |title=Dividing Bail Reform |url=https://ilr.law.uiowa.edu/print/volume-105-issue-3/dividing-bail-reform/ |journal=Iowa Law Review |volume=105 |pages=987}}</ref> In New York, an effort to redesign court summons forms and notify people of their court dates using text messages reduced FTAs by 13% and 21%, respectively.<ref name=":0" /> These interventions resulted in an estimated 30,000 fewer warrants issued over three years.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Fishbane |first1=Alissa |last2=Ouss |first2=Aurelie |last3=Shah |first3=Anuj K. |date=2020 |title=Behavioral Nudges Reduce Failures to Appear in Court |url=https://www.ideas42.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Behavioral-nudges-reduce-failure-to-appear-for-court_Science.full_.pdf |journal=Science |volume=370 |issue=6517 |pages=6 |doi=10.1126/science.abb6591 |pmid=33033154 |s2cid=222235406 |via=Ideas42}}</ref> Critics note that attending court can be particularly onerous for low-income individuals. Studies have documented a lack of access to transportation and childcare as two factors driving FTAs.<ref name=":1" /> Defendants may struggle to make their court dates due to conflicts with their work, as many courts are only open during business hours.<ref name=":1" /> Researchers have confirmed a positive correlation between indigence and FTAs across racial and gender demographics.<ref name=":3">{{Cite journal |last1=Zettler |first1=Haley R. |last2=Morris |first2=Robert G. |date=2015 |title=An Exploratory Assessment of Race and Gender-Specific Predictors of Failure to Appear in Court among Defendants Released via a Pretrial Services Agency |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276133329 |journal=Criminal Justice Review |volume=40 |issue=4 |pages=426|doi=10.1177/0734016815583350 |s2cid=145692540 }}</ref> They speculate that the logistical challenges and financial burdens associated with court attendance drove the disparities observed in their results.<ref name=":3" /> Advocates have called for transportation assistance and childcare support instead of criminal sanctions to address FTAs.<ref name=":11">{{Cite web |date=2020 |title=The Bail Project: After Cash Bail |url=https://bailproject.org/after-cash-bail/ |access-date= |website=The Bail Project |language=en-US}}</ref> Advocates note that some people, including houseless individuals and people dealing with substance abuse, require additional support and that the threat of criminal sanctions is ineffective.<ref name=":11" /> === Warrant backlogs === Some scholars contend that FTAs have led to warrant backlogs nationwide.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Gouldin |first=Lauryn P. |date=2018 |title=Defining Flight Risk |url=https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/sites/lawreview.uchicago.edu/files/02%20Gouldin_ART_SA%20%28JPM%29.pdf |journal=University of Chicago Law Review |volume=85 |pages=690}}</ref> In 2019, around one in seven adults had warrants out for their arrest in New Orleans, Louisiana;<ref>{{Cite news |last=Webster |first=Richard A. |date=September 20, 2019 |title=One in 7 Adults in New Orleans Have a Warrant Out for Their Arrest, New Data Shows |newspaper=Washington Post |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/one-in-7-adults-in-new-orleans-have-a-warrant-out-for-their-arrest-new-data-shows/2019/09/20/db85a5c8-da3d-11e9-a688-303693fb4b0b_story.html |access-date=}}</ref> FTAs were responsible for over half of warrants issued in New Orleans in 2017.<ref>{{Cite web |last=ÓFaoláin |first=Sian Miranda Sing |date=September 2019 |title=NOLA Shakedown: How Criminalizing Municipal Fines & Fees Traps Poor & Working Class Black New Orleanians in Poverty |url=https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5d2ca7adab33e90001930ffd/t/5d8aed38def8834a610ffd83/1569385834213/NOLA-Shakedown-Report-FINAL-Single-Page.pdf }}</ref> A Department of Justice investigation of the police department in Ferguson, Missouri, found that a municipal court had generated thousands of FTA warrants and used them to impose fines and fees on residents.<ref>{{Cite web |date=March 4, 2015 |title=Investigation of the Ferguson Police Department |url=https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/opa/press-releases/attachments/2015/03/04/ferguson_police_department_report.pdf |website=Department of Justice}}</ref> Individuals with warrants out of their arrest may be less likely to seek educational and employment opportunities for fear of getting apprehended.<ref name=":4">{{Cite journal |last=Gouldin |first=Lauryn P. |date=2018 |title=Defining Flight Risk |url=https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/sites/lawreview.uchicago.edu/files/02%20Gouldin_ART_SA%20%28JPM%29.pdf |journal=University of Chicago Law Review |volume=85 |pages=694}}</ref> They may have their driver's license revoked and cannot access public benefits.<ref name=":4" /> Several jurisdictions have taken steps to clear FTA warrants to reduce these backlogs.<ref>{{Cite web |last=O'Dea |first=Colleen |date=January 22, 2019 |title=NJ Supreme Court Dismisses Massive Backlog of Municipal Cases and Warrants |url=https://www.njspotlightnews.org/2019/01/19-01-21-nj-supreme-court-dismisses-massive-backlog-of-municipal-cases-and-warrants/ |website=NJ Spotlight News}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=March 27, 2020 |title=Easing the Burden of Fees and Fines During Covid-19: Brennan Center for Justice |url=https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/easing-burden-fees-and-fines-during-covid-19 |access-date= |website=Brennan Center for Justice |language=en}}</ref> === Questions about FTA prevalence === Whether FTA rates are prevalent enough to warrant criminal sanctions has become a point of contention. FTAs are most common for lower-level, non-violent crimes: primarily in traffic court. Not all individuals who receive a traffic ticket or summons for a minor infraction realize that not attending court can lead to a warrant for their arrest.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Sekhon |first=Nirej |date=2018 |title=Dangerous Warrants |url=https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5048&context=wlr |journal=Washington Law Review |volume=93 |pages=984}}</ref> For serious felonies, FTAs are relatively rare. The most recent data available from the Bureau of Justice Statistics demonstrate that 83% of felony defendants will never miss a court date.<ref name=":5">{{Cite web |last=Reaves |first=Brian A. |date=December 2013 |title=Felony Defendants in Large Urban Counties, 2009 - Statistical Tables |url=https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/fdluc09.pdf |website=Bureau of Justice Statistics}}</ref> The majority of those who miss an appearance will return to court within one year.<ref name=":5" /> FTA rates are also challenging to measure and compare. Some jurisdictions treat a single-missed court appearance as an FTA, such that a new FTA arises whenever an individual misses a court date in a single legal proceeding.<ref name=":1" /> Other jurisdictions treat all missed court appearances within one legal proceeding as a single FTA.<ref name=":1" />
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)