Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Gene duplication
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Polyploidy=== [[Polyploidy]], or ''whole genome duplication'', is a product of [[nondisjunction]] during meiosis which results in additional copies of the entire genome. Polyploidy is common in plants, but it has also occurred in animals, with two rounds of whole genome duplication ([[2R hypothesis|2R event]]) in the vertebrate lineage leading to humans.<ref name="HollandDehal2005">{{cite journal | vauthors = Dehal P, Boore JL | title = Two rounds of whole genome duplication in the ancestral vertebrate | journal = PLOS Biology | volume = 3 | issue = 10 | pages = e314 | date = October 2005 | pmid = 16128622 | pmc = 1197285 | doi = 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030314 | doi-access = free }}</ref> It has also occurred in the hemiascomycete yeasts ~100 mya.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Wolfe|first1=K. H.|last2=Shields|first2=D. C.|date=1997-06-12|title=Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome|journal=Nature|volume=387|issue=6634|pages=708β713|doi=10.1038/42711|issn=0028-0836|pmid=9192896|bibcode=1997Natur.387..708W|s2cid=4307263|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Kellis|first1=Manolis|last2=Birren|first2=Bruce W.|last3=Lander|first3=Eric S.|date=2004-04-08|title=Proof and evolutionary analysis of ancient genome duplication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15004568|journal=Nature|volume=428|issue=6983|pages=617β624|doi=10.1038/nature02424|issn=1476-4687|pmid=15004568|bibcode=2004Natur.428..617K|s2cid=4422074}}</ref> After a whole genome duplication, there is a relatively short period of genome instability, extensive gene loss, elevated levels of nucleotide substitution and regulatory network rewiring.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Otto|first=Sarah P.|date=2007-11-02|title=The evolutionary consequences of polyploidy|journal=Cell|volume=131|issue=3|pages=452β462|doi=10.1016/j.cell.2007.10.022|issn=0092-8674|pmid=17981114|s2cid=10054182|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Conant|first1=Gavin C.|last2=Wolfe|first2=Kenneth H.|date=April 2006|title=Functional partitioning of yeast co-expression networks after genome duplication|journal=PLOS Biology|volume=4|issue=4|pages=e109|doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.0040109|issn=1545-7885|pmc=1420641|pmid=16555924 |doi-access=free }}</ref> In addition, gene dosage effects play a significant role.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Papp|first1=BalΓ‘zs|last2=PΓ‘l|first2=Csaba|last3=Hurst|first3=Laurence D.|date=2003-07-10|title=Dosage sensitivity and the evolution of gene families in yeast|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12853957|journal=Nature|volume=424|issue=6945|pages=194β197|doi=10.1038/nature01771|issn=1476-4687|pmid=12853957|bibcode=2003Natur.424..194P|s2cid=4382441}}</ref> Thus, most duplicates are lost within a short period, however, a considerable fraction of duplicates survive.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Lynch|first1=M.|last2=Conery|first2=J. S.|date=2000-11-10|title=The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11073452|journal=Science|volume=290|issue=5494|pages=1151β1155|doi=10.1126/science.290.5494.1151|issn=0036-8075|pmid=11073452|bibcode=2000Sci...290.1151L}}</ref> Interestingly, genes involved in regulation are preferentially retained.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Freeling|first1=Michael|last2=Thomas|first2=Brian C.|date=July 2006|title=Gene-balanced duplications, like tetraploidy, provide predictable drive to increase morphological complexity|journal=Genome Research|volume=16|issue=7|pages=805β814|doi=10.1101/gr.3681406|issn=1088-9051|pmid=16818725|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Davis|first1=Jerel C.|last2=Petrov|first2=Dmitri A.|date=October 2005|title=Do disparate mechanisms of duplication add similar genes to the genome?|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16098632|journal=Trends in Genetics |volume=21|issue=10|pages=548β551|doi=10.1016/j.tig.2005.07.008|issn=0168-9525|pmid=16098632}}</ref> Furthermore, retention of regulatory genes, most notably the [[Hox gene]]s, has led to adaptive innovation. Rapid evolution and functional divergence have been observed at the level of the transcription of duplicated genes, usually by point mutations in short transcription factor binding motifs.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Casneuf|first1=Tineke|last2=De Bodt|first2=Stefanie|last3=Raes|first3=Jeroen|last4=Maere|first4=Steven|last5=Van de Peer|first5=Yves|date=2006|title=Nonrandom divergence of gene expression following gene and genome duplications in the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana|journal=Genome Biology|volume=7|issue=2|pages=R13|doi=10.1186/gb-2006-7-2-r13|issn=1474-760X|pmc=1431724|pmid=16507168 |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Li|first1=Wen-Hsiung|last2=Yang|first2=Jing|last3=Gu|first3=Xun|date=November 2005|title=Expression divergence between duplicate genes|url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16140417|journal=Trends in Genetics |volume=21|issue=11|pages=602β607|doi=10.1016/j.tig.2005.08.006|issn=0168-9525|pmid=16140417}}</ref> Furthermore, rapid evolution of protein phosphorylation motifs, usually embedded within rapidly evolving intrinsically disordered regions is another contributing factor for survival and rapid adaptation/neofunctionalization of duplicate genes.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|last1=Amoutzias|first1=Grigoris D.|last2=He|first2=Ying|last3=Gordon|first3=Jonathan|last4=Mossialos|first4=Dimitris|last5=Oliver|first5=Stephen G.|last6=Van de Peer|first6=Yves|date=2010-02-16|title=Posttranslational regulation impacts the fate of duplicated genes|journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|volume=107|issue=7|pages=2967β2971|doi=10.1073/pnas.0911603107|issn=1091-6490|pmc=2840353|pmid=20080574|bibcode=2010PNAS..107.2967A|doi-access=free}}</ref> Thus, a link seems to exist between gene regulation (at least at the post-translational level) and genome evolution.<ref name=":0" /> Polyploidy is also a well known source of speciation, as offspring, which have different numbers of chromosomes compared to parent species, are often unable to interbreed with non-polyploid organisms. Whole genome duplications are thought to be less detrimental than aneuploidy as the relative dosage of individual genes should be the same.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)