Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Hilbert's problems
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Table of problems== Hilbert's 23 problems are (for details on the solutions and references, see the articles that are linked to in the first column): {| class="wikitable sortable" |- ! Problem !class="unsortable"| Brief explanation ! Status ! Year solved |- |style="text-align:center"| [[Hilbert's first problem|1st]] | The [[continuum hypothesis]] (that is, there is no [[Set (mathematics)|set]] whose [[cardinality]] is strictly between that of the [[integer]]s and that of the [[real number]]s) |{{partial|align=left|{{sort|2|}} Proven to be impossible to prove or disprove within [[Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory]] with or without the [[axiom of choice]] (provided Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory is [[consistency|consistent]], i.e., it does not contain a contradiction). There is no consensus on whether this is a solution to the problem.}} |style="text-align:center"| 1940, 1963 |- |style="text-align:center"| [[Hilbert's second problem|2nd]] | Prove that the [[axiom]]s of [[arithmetic]] are [[consistency|consistent]]. |{{partial|align=left|{{sort|2|}} There is no consensus on whether results of [[Kurt Gödel|Gödel]] and [[Gerhard Gentzen|Gentzen]] give a solution to the problem as stated by Hilbert. Gödel's [[Gödel's incompleteness theorems|second incompleteness theorem]], proved in 1931, shows that no proof of its consistency can be carried out within arithmetic itself. Gentzen proved in 1936 that the consistency of arithmetic follows from the [[well-founded relation|well-foundedness]] of the [[epsilon numbers (mathematics)|ordinal ''ε''<sub>0</sub>]].}} |style="text-align:center"| 1931, 1936 |- |style="text-align:center"| [[Hilbert's third problem|3rd]] | Given any two [[polyhedron|polyhedra]] of equal volume, is it always possible to cut the first into finitely many polyhedral pieces that can be reassembled to yield the second? |{{yes|align=left|{{sort|1|}} Resolved. Result: No, proved using [[Dehn invariant]]s.}} |style="text-align:center"| 1900 |- |style="text-align:center"| [[Hilbert's fourth problem|4th]] | Construct all [[metric space|metrics]] where lines are [[geodesic]]s. |{{unknown|align=left|style=font-size:inherit|{{sort|4|}} Too vague to be stated resolved or not.{{refn|According to Gray, most of the problems have been solved. Some were not defined completely, but enough progress has been made to consider them "solved"; Gray lists the fourth problem as too vague to say whether it has been solved.|group=lower-alpha}} }} |style="text-align:center"| — |- |style="text-align:center"| [[Hilbert's fifth problem|5th]] | Are continuous [[group (mathematics)|groups]] automatically [[Lie group|differential groups]]? |{{partial|align=left|{{sort|2|}} Resolved by [[Andrew Gleason]], assuming one interpretation of the original statement. If, however, it is understood as an equivalent of the [[Hilbert–Smith conjecture]], it is still unsolved.}} |style="text-align:center"| 1953? |- |style="text-align:center"| [[Hilbert's sixth problem|6th]] | Mathematical treatment of the [[axiom]]s of [[physics]]: (a) axiomatic treatment of probability with limit theorems for foundation of [[statistical physics]] (b) the rigorous theory of limiting processes "which lead from the atomistic view to the laws of motion of continua" |{{partial|align=left|{{sort|2|}} Unresolved, or partially resolved, depending on how the original statement is interpreted.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Corry |first1=L. |year=1997 |title=David Hilbert and the axiomatization of physics (1894–1905) |journal=Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. |volume=51 |issue=2 |pages=83–198 |doi=10.1007/BF00375141 |s2cid=122709777 }}</ref> Items (a) and (b) were two specific problems given by Hilbert in a later explanation.<ref name=Hilbert_1902/> [[probability axioms|Kolmogorov's axiomatics]] (1933) is now accepted as standard for the foundations of probability theory. There is some success on the way from the "atomistic view to the laws of motion of continua",<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Gorban |first1=A. N. |author-link=Alexander Nikolaevich Gorban |last2=Karlin |first2=I. |year=2014 |title=Hilbert's 6th Problem: Exact and approximate hydrodynamic manifolds for kinetic equations |journal=Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society |volume=51 |issue=2 |pages=186–246 |arxiv=1310.0406 |doi=10.1090/S0273-0979-2013-01439-3| doi-access= free}}</ref>}} but the transition from classical to quantum physics means that there would have to be two axiomatic formulations, with a clear link between them. [[John von Neumann]] made an early attempt to place [[quantum mechanics]] on a rigorous mathematical basis in his book ''[[Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics]]'',<ref>{{Cite book |last=Von Neumann |first=John |author-link=John von Neumann |url=https://press.princeton.edu/titles/11352.html |title=Mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics |date=2018 |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=978-0-691-17856-1 |editor-last=Wheeler |editor-first=Nicholas A. |location=Princeton Oxford |translator-last=Beyer |translator-first=Robert T.}}</ref> but subsequent developments have occurred, further challenging the axiomatic foundations of quantum physics. |style="text-align:center"| 1933–2002? |- |style="text-align:center"| [[Hilbert's seventh problem|7th]] | Is ''a<sup>b</sup>'' [[transcendental number|transcendental]], for [[algebraic number|algebraic]] ''a'' ≠ 0,1 and [[irrational number|irrational]] algebraic ''b'' ? |{{yes|align=left|{{sort|1|}} Resolved. Result: Yes, illustrated by the [[Gelfond–Schneider theorem]].}} |style="text-align:center"| 1934 |- |style="text-align:center"| [[Hilbert's eighth problem|8th]] | The [[Riemann hypothesis]] ("the real part of any non-[[Triviality (mathematics)|trivial]] [[Zero of a function|zero]] of the [[Riemann zeta function]] is 1/2") and other prime-number problems, among them [[Goldbach's conjecture]] and the [[twin prime conjecture]] |{{no|align=left|{{sort|3|}} Unresolved.}} |style="text-align:center"| — |- |style="text-align:center"| [[Hilbert's ninth problem|9th]] | Find the most general law of the [[Quadratic reciprocity|reciprocity theorem]] in any [[algebra]]ic [[number field]]. |{{partial|align=left|{{sort|2|}} Partially resolved. Solved by [[Emil Artin]] in 1927 for [[abelian extension]]s of the [[rational number]]s during the development of [[class field theory]]. The non-abelian case remains unsolved, if one interprets that as meaning [[non-abelian class field theory]].|group=lower-alpha}} |style="text-align:center"| — |- |style="text-align:center"| [[Hilbert's tenth problem|10th]] | Find an algorithm to determine whether a given polynomial [[Diophantine equation]] with integer coefficients has an integer solution. |{{yes|align=left|{{sort|1|}} Resolved. Result: Impossible; [[Matiyasevich's theorem]] implies that there is no such algorithm.}} |style="text-align:center"| 1970 |- |style="text-align:center"| [[Hilbert's eleventh problem|11th]] | Solving [[quadratic form]]s with algebraic numerical [[coefficient]]s. |{{partial|align=left|{{sort|2|}} Partially resolved.<ref name="Hazewinkel">{{cite book |first=Michiel |last=Hazewinkel |date=2009 |title=Handbook of Algebra |publisher=Elsevier |page=69 |isbn=978-0080932811 |volume=6}}</ref>}} |style="text-align:center"| — |- |style="text-align:center"| [[Hilbert's twelfth problem|12th]] | Extend the [[Kronecker–Weber theorem]] on abelian extensions of the [[rational number]]s to any base number field. |{{partial|align=left|{{sort|2|}} Partially resolved.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.quantamagazine.org/mathematicians-find-polynomial-building-blocks-hilbert-sought-20210525/ |first=Kelsey |last=Houston-Edwards |title=Mathematicians Find Long-Sought Building Blocks for Special Polynomials |date=25 May 2021 }}</ref>}} |style="text-align:center"| — |- |style="text-align:center"| [[Hilbert's thirteenth problem|13th]] | Solve [[septic equation|7th-degree equation]] using algebraic (variant: continuous) [[mathematical function|functions]] of two [[parameter]]s. |{{no|align=left|{{sort|3|}} Unresolved. The continuous variant of this problem was solved by [[Vladimir Arnold]] in 1957 based on work by [[Andrei Kolmogorov]] (see [[Kolmogorov–Arnold representation theorem]]), but the algebraic variant is unresolved.{{refn|1=It is not difficult to show that the problem has a partial solution within the space of single-valued analytic functions (Raudenbush). Some authors argue that Hilbert intended for a solution within the space of (multi-valued) algebraic functions, thus continuing his own work on algebraic functions and being a question about a possible extension of the [[Galois theory]] (see, for example, Abhyankar<ref name="Abyankar">{{cite book |url=http://www.emis.de/journals/SC/1997/2/pdf/smf_sem-cong_2_1-11.pdf |first=Shreeram S. |last=Abhyankar |title=Hilbert's Thirteenth Problem |series=Séminaires et Congrès |volume=2 |publisher=Société Mathématique de France |date=1997}}</ref> Vitushkin,<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Vitushkin |first1=Anatoliy G. |title=On Hilbert's thirteenth problem and related questions |journal=Russian Mathematical Surveys |date=2004 |volume=59 |issue=1 |pages=11–25 |doi=10.1070/RM2004v059n01ABEH000698 |publisher=Russian Academy of Sciences|bibcode=2004RuMaS..59...11V |s2cid=250837749 }}</ref> Chebotarev,<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Morozov |first1=Vladimir V. |title=О некоторых вопросах проблемы резольвент |journal=Proceedings of Kazan University |date=1954 |volume=114 |issue=2 |pages=173–187 |url=http://www.mathnet.ru/php/getFT.phtml?jrnid=uzku&paperid=406&what=fullt&option_lang=eng |publisher=Kazan University |language=ru |trans-title=On certain questions of the problem of resolvents}}</ref> and others). It appears from one of Hilbert's papers<ref>{{cite journal |first=David |last=Hilbert |title=Über die Gleichung neunten Grades |journal=Math. Ann. |volume=97 |year=1927 |pages=243–250 |doi=10.1007/BF01447867 |s2cid=179178089 }}</ref> that this was his original intention for the problem. The language of Hilbert there is "{{lang|de|Existenz von ''algebraischen'' Funktionen|italic=unset}}" ("existence of ''algebraic'' functions"). As such, the problem is still unresolved.|group=lower-alpha}} }} |style="text-align:center"| — |- |style="text-align:center"| [[Hilbert's fourteenth problem|14th]] | Is the [[invariant theory|ring of invariants]] of an [[algebraic group]] acting on a [[polynomial ring]] always [[Finitely generated algebra|finitely generated]]? |{{yes|align=left|{{sort|1|}} Resolved. Result: No, a counterexample was constructed by [[Masayoshi Nagata]].}} |style="text-align:center"| 1959 |- |style="text-align:center"| [[Hilbert's fifteenth problem|15th]] | Rigorous foundation of [[Schubert's enumerative calculus]]. |{{partial|align=left|{{sort|2|}} Partially resolved.<ref name="KL">{{cite journal | last1=Kleiman | first1=S.L.| last2=Laksov | first2=Dan |author1-link=Steven Kleiman |author2-link=Dan Laksov|title= Schubert Calculus | publisher=American Mathematical Society|journal = American Mathematical Monthly | volume=79| issue=10 | year=1972 | issn=0377-9017 | doi=10.1080/00029890.1972.11993188 | pages=1061–1082 }}</ref> Haibao Duan and Xuezhi Zhao claimed that this problem is actually resolved.}} |style="text-align:center"| — |- |style="text-align:center"| [[Hilbert's sixteenth problem|16th]] | Describe relative positions of ovals originating from a [[real number|real]] [[algebraic curve]] and as [[limit cycle]]s of a polynomial [[vector field]] on the plane. |{{no|align=left|{{sort|3|}} Unresolved, even for algebraic curves of degree 8.}} |style="text-align:center"| — |- |style="text-align:center"| [[Hilbert's seventeenth problem|17th]] | Express a nonnegative [[rational function]] as [[quotient]] of sums of [[Square (algebra)|squares]]. |{{yes|align=left|{{sort|1|}} Resolved. Result: Yes, due to [[Emil Artin]]. Moreover, an upper limit was established for the number of square terms necessary.}} |style="text-align:center"| 1927 |- |rowspan=3 style="text-align:center"| [[Hilbert's eighteenth problem|18th]] | (a) Are there only finitely many essentially different [[space group]]s in ''n''-dimensional Euclidean space? |{{yes|align=left|{{sort|1|}} Resolved. Result: Yes (by [[Ludwig Bieberbach]])}} |style="text-align:center"| 1910 |- | (b) Is there a polyhedron that admits only an [[anisohedral tiling]] in three dimensions? |{{yes|align=left|{{sort|1|}} Resolved. Result: Yes (by [[Karl Reinhardt (mathematician)|Karl Reinhardt]]).}} |style="text-align:center"| 1928 |- | (c) What is the densest [[sphere packing]]? |{{yes|align=left|{{sort|1|}} Widely believed to be resolved, by [[computer-assisted proof]] (by [[Thomas Callister Hales]]). Result: Highest density achieved by [[Close-packing of equal spheres|close packings]], each with density approximately 74%, such as face-centered cubic close packing and hexagonal close packing.{{refn|Gray also lists the 18th problem as "open" in his 2000 book, because the sphere-packing problem (also known as the [[Kepler conjecture]]) was unsolved, but a solution to it has now been claimed.|group=lower-alpha}}}} |style="text-align:center"| 1998 |- |style="text-align:center"| [[Hilbert's nineteenth problem|19th]] | Are the solutions of regular problems in the [[calculus of variations]] always necessarily [[Analytic function|analytic]]? |{{yes|align=left|{{sort|1|}} Resolved. Result: Yes, proven by [[Ennio De Giorgi]] and, independently and using different methods, by [[John Forbes Nash]].}} |style="text-align:center"| 1957 |- |style="text-align:center"| [[Hilbert's twentieth problem|20th]] | Do all [[calculus of variations|variational problems]] with certain [[boundary condition]]s have solutions? |{{partial|align=left|{{sort|2|}} Partially resolved. A significant topic of research throughout the 20th century, resulting in solutions for some cases.<ref name="Gilbarg Trudinger 2001 Elliptic PDEs ">{{cite book | last1=Gilbarg | first1=David | last2=Trudinger | first2=Neil S. | title=Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order | publisher=Springer Science & Business Media | publication-place=Berlin New York | date=2001-01-12 | isbn=978-3-540-41160-4 | page=}}</ref><ref name="Serrin 1969 Dirichlet">{{cite journal | last= Serrin | first=James | title=The problem of Dirichlet for quasilinear elliptic differential equations with many independent variables | journal=Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences | volume=264 | issue=1153 | date=1969-05-08 | issn=0080-4614 | doi=10.1098/rsta.1969.0033 | pages=413–496| bibcode=1969RSPTA.264..413S }}</ref><ref name="Mawhin 1999 pp. 195–228">{{cite journal | last=Mawhin | first=Jean | title=Leray-Schauder degree: a half century of extensions and applications | journal=Topological Methods in Nonlinear Analysis | publisher=Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Juliusz Schauder Center for Nonlinear Studies | volume=14 | issue=2 | date=1 January 1999 | issn=1230-3429 | doi=10.12775/TMNA.1999.029 | pages=195–228 | url=https://projecteuclid.org/journals/topological-methods-in-nonlinear-analysis/volume-14/issue-2/Leray-Schauder-degree--a-half-century-of-extensions-and/tmna/1475179840.full | access-date=8 April 2024}}</ref>}} |style="text-align:center"| ? |- |style="text-align:center"| [[Hilbert's twenty-first problem|21st]] | Proof of the existence of [[Fuchsian theory|Fuchsian]] [[linear differential equation]]s having a prescribed [[monodromy group]] |{{Yes|{{sort|2|}} Resolved. Result: No, shown by A. Bolibrukh. <ref name="Plemelj">{{Citation | last1=Plemelj | first1=Josip | editor1-last=Radok. | editor1-first=J. R. M. | title=Problems in the sense of Riemann and Klein | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=f0urAAAAIAAJ | publisher=Interscience Publishers John Wiley & Sons Inc.|location= New York-London-Sydney | series= Interscience Tracts in Pure and Applied Mathematics | mr=0174815 | year=1964 | volume=16| isbn=9780470691250 }}</ref><ref name ="Anasov_Bolibruch">{{Citation | last1=Anosov | first1=D. V. | last2=Bolibruch | first2=A. A. | authorlink2=Andrei Bolibrukh | title=The Riemann-Hilbert problem | publisher=Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn | location=Braunschweig | series=Aspects of Mathematics, E22 | isbn=978-3-528-06496-9 | mr=1276272 | year=1994 | doi=10.1007/978-3-322-92909-9}}</ref><ref name ="Bolibruch1">{{Citation | last1=Bolibrukh | first1=A. A. | title=The Riemann-Hilbert problem | doi=10.1070/RM1990v045n02ABEH002350 | mr=1069347 | year=1990 | journal=Akademiya Nauk SSSR I Moskovskoe Matematicheskoe Obshchestvo. Uspekhi Matematicheskikh Nauk | issn=0042-1316 | volume=45 | issue=2 | pages=3–47| bibcode=1990RuMaS..45Q...1B | s2cid=250853546 |language=Russian}}</ref><ref name ="Bolibruch2">{{Citation | last1=Bolibrukh | first1=A.A. | title=Sufficient conditions for the positive solvability of the Riemann-Hilbert problem | journal=Matematicheskie Zametki |pages=110–117 | language=Russian | year=1992| volume=51 | issue=2 |mr=1165460 | doi=10.1007/BF02102113| s2cid = 121743184}}</ref>|align=left}} |style="text-align:center"| 1989 |- |style="text-align:center"| [[Hilbert's twenty-second problem|22nd]] | Uniformization of analytic relations by means of [[automorphic function]]s |{{partial|align=left|{{sort|2|}} Partially resolved. [[Uniformization theorem]]}} |style="text-align:center"| ? |- |style="text-align:center"| [[Hilbert's twenty-third problem|23rd]] | Further development of the [[calculus of variations]] |{{unknown|align=left|style=font-size:inherit|{{sort|4|}} Too vague to be stated resolved or not.}} |style="text-align:center"| — |}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)