Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Integer
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Equivalence classes of ordered pairs === [[File:Relative numbers representation.svg|thumb|alt=Representation of equivalence classes for the numbers β5 to 5 |Red points represent ordered pairs of [[natural number]]s. Linked red points are equivalence classes representing the blue integers at the end of the line.|upright=1.5]] In modern set-theoretic mathematics, a more abstract construction<ref>Ivorra Castillo: ''Γlgebra''</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last1=Kramer |first1=JΓΌrg |title=From Natural Numbers to Quaternions |last2=von Pippich |first2=Anna-Maria |publisher=Springer Cham |year=2017 |isbn=978-3-319-69427-6 |edition=1st |location=Switzerland |pages=78β81 |language=en |doi=10.1007/978-3-319-69429-0}}</ref> allowing one to define arithmetical operations without any case distinction is often used instead.<ref>{{cite book |title=Learning to Teach Number: A Handbook for Students and Teachers in the Primary School |series=The Stanley Thornes Teaching Primary Maths Series |first=Len |last=Frobisher |publisher=Nelson Thornes |year=1999 |isbn=978-0-7487-3515-0 |page=126 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KwJQIt4jQHUC&pg=PA126 |access-date=2016-02-15 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161208121843/https://books.google.com/books?id=KwJQIt4jQHUC&pg=PA126 |archive-date=2016-12-08 |url-status=live}}.</ref> The integers can thus be formally constructed as the [[equivalence class]]es of [[ordered pair]]s of [[natural number]]s {{math|(''a'',''b'')}}.<ref name="Campbell-1970-p83">{{cite book |author=Campbell, Howard E. |title=The structure of arithmetic |publisher=Appleton-Century-Crofts |year=1970 |isbn=978-0-390-16895-5 |page=[https://archive.org/details/structureofarith00camp/page/83 83] |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/structureofarith00camp/page/83 }}</ref> The intuition is that {{math|(''a'',''b'')}} stands for the result of subtracting {{math|''b''}} from {{math|''a''}}.<ref name="Campbell-1970-p83"/> To confirm our expectation that {{nowrap|1 β 2}} and {{nowrap|4 β 5}} denote the same number, we define an [[equivalence relation]] {{math|~}} on these pairs with the following rule: :<math>(a,b)\sim(c,d) </math> precisely when :<math>a+d=b+c </math>. Addition and multiplication of integers can be defined in terms of the equivalent operations on the natural numbers;<ref name="Campbell-1970-p83"/> by using {{math|[(''a'',''b'')]}} to denote the equivalence class having {{math|(''a'',''b'')}} as a member, one has: :<math>[(a,b)]+[(c,d)]:=[(a+c,b+d)]</math>. :<math>[(a,b)]\cdot[(c,d)]:=[(ac+bd,ad+bc)]</math>. The negation (or additive inverse) of an integer is obtained by reversing the order of the pair: :<math>-[(a,b)]:=[(b,a)]</math>. Hence subtraction can be defined as the addition of the additive inverse: :<math>[(a,b)]-[(c,d)]:=[(a+d,b+c)]</math>. The standard ordering on the integers is given by: :<math>[(a,b)]<[(c,d)]</math> [[if and only if]] <math>a+d<b+c</math>. It is easily verified that these definitions are independent of the choice of representatives of the equivalence classes. Every equivalence class has a unique member that is of the form {{math|(''n'',0)}} or {{math|(0,''n'')}} (or both at once). The natural number {{math|''n''}} is identified with the class {{math|[(''n'',0)]}} (i.e., the natural numbers are [[embedding|embedded]] into the integers by map sending {{math|''n''}} to {{math|[(''n'',0)]}}), and the class {{math|[(0,''n'')]}} is denoted {{math|β''n''}} (this covers all remaining classes, and gives the class {{math|[(0,0)]}} a second time since β0 = 0. Thus, {{math|[(''a'',''b'')]}} is denoted by :<math>\begin{cases}a-b,&\mbox{if }a\ge b\\-(b-a),&\mbox{if }a<b\end{cases}</math> If the natural numbers are identified with the corresponding integers (using the embedding mentioned above), this convention creates no ambiguity. This notation recovers the familiar [[group representation|representation]] of the integers as {{math|{..., β2, β1, 0, 1, 2, ...} }}. Some examples are: :<math>\begin{align}0&=[(0,0)]&=[(1,1)]&=\cdots& &=[(k,k)]\\1&=[(1,0)]&=[(2,1)]&=\cdots&&=[(k+1,k)]\\-1&=[(0,1)]&=[(1,2)]&=\cdots&&=[(k,k+1)]\\2&=[(2,0)]&=[(3,1)]&=\cdots&&=[(k+2,k)]\\-2&=[(0,2)]&= [(1,3)]&=\cdots&&=[(k,k+2)]\end{align}</math>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)